TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Jesse Robertson

Is this your requester account?
University of North Texas
  • Overview
  • Reviews 36
  • HITs 3

Jesse Robertson Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Slowly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Jesse Robertson Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

orionhawk Fast Reader
Reviews: 8,671
Points: 7,686
Ratings: 615
A Study of Jurors’ Judgment in Audit Litigation(~ 25 minutes) - $2.50

Low

Unrated

Pending

$12.03 / hour

00:12:28 / completion time

Advice to Requester

"FAILURE TO CORRECTLY ANSWER 90% OF THE REVIEW QUESTIONS WILL RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR HIT." - Rejection of a completed HIT for this reason WILL be reviewed as unfair. Kick people out rather than letting them submit, or pay.

"It is critical for society that auditors exercise due professional care" - arguable. "critical for investors", maybe

"examined lease contracts to determine whether they should be classified as operating or capital" - that's not the same terminology used in the beginning

"This is consistent with current audit practice where other leading audit firms would assign artificial intelligence software to automatically examine lease contracts." Plaintiff's job to show that not to be the case, no evidence nor witnesses presented.

Also, while I haven't done any of the academic or professional backgrounds for this topic you repeatedly asked about, I have done probably at least a dozen mturk "mock jury" studies on EXACTLY this.
Jan 24, 2023 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Calyrica Proficient Worker
Reviews: 4,389
Points: 4,131
Ratings: 449
A Survey of Juror Decision Making - $4.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$21.18 / hour

00:12:45 / completion time

Pros

Maybe I've done a lot of these, but this one was very similar to others, so it went quick. I didn't have to read the preliminary material describing background knowledge very closely. YMMV

Cons

Lots of reading
May 15, 2018

WimpLo Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 6,723
Points: 6,764
Ratings: 882
A Survey of Juror Decision Making - $4.50

Low

Unrated

Pending

$6.35 / hour

00:42:30 / completion time

Pros

Cons

There's lots of reading and no progress bar to measure how far you've got to go. Careful reading is required for answering the comprehension questions and a minimum score is mentioned as a requirement.
May 15, 2018

Want to see Jesse Robertson's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Jesse Robertson


A38BLXQSBS5333 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


A Study of Decision Making in a Business Setting
A Study of Decision Making in an Organizational Setting
A Study of Decision-Making in a Business Setting
A Study of Investor Judgment and Decision-Making(~ 25 minutes)
A Study of Juror Judgment in Audit Litigation(~ 25 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact