Find Requesters Worth Working With
Using data shared by some of the most experienced workers on MTurk users can gain insights into HITs that pay well and are safe to work on. Our users maintain some of the highest standards on the platform, most holding over a 99.5% approval rate, meaning HITs that appear here will pay out when completed properly.
UPDATE 8/30
Turns out I made a mistake by not advancing the screen after receiving my code. Something I've done before but have always managed to catch until now. That's my bad. The requester responded 9 days after I first contacted them and explained in the email they sent me,
"Sorry for the delay in responding!
I manually checked all the approvals and I think I know what happened. Some people forgot to hit "Next" to actually submit the survey in Qualtrics. Therefore, no data was recorded at all and I was unable to approve. Sorry if that happened to you! I went back and tried to make it very clear in the instructions that the "Next" button had to be pressed after I noticed a few people's results were not saved.
I will be launching a couple other surveys like this one in the near future and will pay out the same amount. Keep an eye out for them if you're interested in taking the survey again."
They reversed the rejection and went on to explain the odd feedback I mentioned in the original review,
"Also, just wanted to further apologize because I didn't realize the rejected is sent to Turkers as "x". In the instructions for approvals it doesn't clarify there is supposed to be feedback in this box instead of just marking it as approved or rejected! I'll make sure to provide feedback in the future to rejected HITs."
I in turn apologized for my mistake, thanked them, and am updating the review to reflect how things played out. Whoever it is pulling the strings behind the account on this one seems like good people and I wanted to make sure I owned my part and gave them credit for theirs.
************************
Original Review
************************
This is one of those fill in all the bubbles about your feelings surveys. Not a terrible one. I completed the survey with no problems whatsoever, received my completion code, and submitted the HIT.
The Advantage of a Clear View
TurkerView is designed to bridge the gap between workers & requesters through data & communication.
Wage Aggregate Tracking
This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.
| Color | Pay Range (Hourly) | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| RED | < $7.25 / hr | Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage |
| ORANGE | $7.25 - $10.00 / hr | Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages. |
| GREEN | > $10.00 / hr | Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards |
Reward Sentiment
Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.
| Icon | Rating | Suggested Guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Underpaid 1 / 5 |
|
|
| Low 2 / 5 |
|
|
| Fair 3 / 5 |
|
|
| Good 4 / 5 |
|
|
| Generous 5 / 5 |
|
Communication Ratings
Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.
| Icon | Rating | Suggested Guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Unacceptable 1 / 5 |
|
|
| Poor 2 / 5 |
|
|
| Acceptable 3 / 5 |
|
|
| Good 4 / 5 |
|
|
| Excellent 5 / 5 |
|
Approval Time Tracking
This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.
| Icon | Rating | Approval Time |
|---|---|---|
| Very Slow 1 / 5 | Over 2 weeks | |
| Slow 2 / 5 | ~1 - 2 Weeks | |
| Average 3 / 5 | ~3 - 7 Days | |
| Fast 4 / 5 | ~1 - 3 Days | |
| Very Fast 5 / 5 | ~24 hours or less |
Data Driven by TurkerViewJS
TurkerViewJS is the engine behind TurkerView. An efficient collection process combined with a user-friendly interface encourages more frequent worker input & allows for the refinement of aggregate data in real time.
Our API also allows users access to real-time data about HITs and requesters. Users can feel confident with the knowledge that our platform has vetted thousands of requesters who treat workers fairly.
Counting on Community
0+
Unique Requesters
have been reviewed by users on TurkerView
0+
Individual Reviews
are available to TurkerView users
0+
Awesome Users
and counting are part of the TurkerView community