TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Kelly McWilliams

Is this your requester account?
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
  • Overview
  • Reviews 77
  • HITs 19

Kelly McWilliams Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Kelly McWilliams Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Omnifarious Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 71
Points: 58
Ratings: -1
Examining Witness Testimony In Domestic Homicides - $13.50

Generous

Unacceptable

Approved

$27.80 / hour

00:29:08 / completion time

Pros

Decent pay if she paid.

Cons

I copy/pasted every page of the case to notepad++ so that I could make it readable for my bad eye-sight.

This requester thinks it's acceptable to have no AC/MC on any pages and only use time-spent on pages as the sole decider on if somebody has read everything or not.

So to her despite the task taking me almost half an hour to do since I was you know reading everything she has decided that because each READING page took me a few seconds to move past (since I was copying it to notepad) that I automatically didn't pay attention to the task which is a load of bunk.

Advice to Requester

Survey software has multitudes of ways to ensure high quality responses/workers paying attention. How about you actually use some of those instead of using something as questionable as time spent on each page to decide if they actually read stuff?
Mar 7, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.
Kelly McWilliams (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

You move through the study at a pace indicating you have not carefully read the study materials (e.g., too quickly to have read the materials).

This rejection was overturned!


jessers Average Pace
Reviews: 1,610
Points: 2,143
Ratings: 202
Examining Witness Testimony In Domestic Homicides - $13.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$31.62 / hour

00:25:37 / completion time

Pros

- amazing pay
- about 90% of it is reading a court case. i'm familiar with legal/true crime/whatever so it was a breeze for me, but it might be heavy for someone who's not. it wasn't jargon-y in any way though, just a LOT of reading (which is a thumbs up for me).
- i want to do these all day every day please and thank you.

Cons

- don't do it if you feel uncomfortable reading about extreme domestic violence.
- A LOT of reading, so skip it if it isn't your thing.
- recaptcha at the bottom of almost every page. doesn't bother me, but some of you gentle souls are easily triggered.
Aug 31, 2018

eyeofodin Average Pace
Reviews: 255
Points: 454
Ratings: 174
Adult sequencing(~ 30 minutes) - $5.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$12.43 / hour

00:24:08 / completion time

Pros

None

Cons

I HATED this HIT.
You are treated like a child for a solid 20 minutes. You answer the same questions over and over and over that all require typing.
Questions are all in a before, after, during setting. Example would be - You read the con after you read what? You read the Pro in what order? Pros before what? Cons come after what. You will answer these questions 30-ish times per set.
Low hourly. Extremely low for the work and mental suffering involved.
Jul 26, 2022 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Kelly McWilliams's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Kelly McWilliams


A2QC24MZCXIUPQ MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Adult sequencing(~ 30 minutes)
Adult’s Perception of Children’s Temporal Judgments
Adults' Temporal Judgments(~ 30 minutes)
Adults' Temporal Reasoning(~ 30 minutes)
Adults' Temporal Judgments(~ 30 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact