TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Neal M. Snow

Is this your requester account?
Lehigh University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 26
  • HITs 1

Neal M. Snow Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Neal M. Snow Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Cipher Fast Reader
Reviews: 3,534
Points: 2,068
Ratings: 48
Survey on auditors - $10.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$22.73 / hour

00:26:24 / completion time

Pros

Requester made a hilarious comment at the end of the survey stating, "Please do not share the unique code with anyone else, as payment will only be made once per ID. I am trying to limit the number of people I disappoint in this life."

Aside from that humorous moment, there was quite the read and rather simple questions that all functioned correctly, didn't intend to deceive and hardly the attention checks as long as you read so a quality survey / requester this person is!

Cons

Apr 2, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Reviews: 12,508
Points: 10,987
Ratings: 1,384
Survey on auditors - $10.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$29.13 / hour

00:20:36 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Lots of intensive reading. After completing the demographics, I received "I'm sorry, you didn't pay close enough attention." So, either I missed an attention check or there was a code error. Since I had already completed the entire study at that point, I submitted with my WorkerID and sent a message.

Requester rejected the HIT, but then emailed an apology for the error and asked if I would accept a Paypal payment. I responded back with the instructions to reverse a rejection and explained my preference for that method, instead.

Requester responded that the rejection was reversed.... but it wasn't. I sent instructions again.
Reversed ~24 hours.
Mar 28, 2019
Neal M. Snow (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

ID provided does not match the unique ID provided at the end of the survey.

I am happy to discuss alternative payments further over email (nes315@lehigh.edu), as I know this is not a short study. However, I also need to collect enough responses for my study so I need to repost the responses. Thank you for your understanding.

This rejection was overturned!


Dwthur Fast Reader
Reviews: 106
Points: 103
Ratings: 10
Survey on auditors - $10.00

Generous

Excellent

Approved

$32.09 / hour

00:18:42 / completion time

Pros

HIT was interesting and required attention during the task, which is nice. Generous pay, and communicative requester -- an error initially caused me to be screened out at end, so I submitted w/ my ID and was rejected. Emailed requested and explained issue and the rejection was overturned. Would work for requester again!

Cons

Apr 3, 2019

Want to see Neal M. Snow's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Neal M. Snow


A20TFNIE2XVTAP MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Question answered or not
Survey on auditors
Survey on social media

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2023 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact