Neal M. Snow Ratings
Workers feel this requester pays generously
Approves Quickly
No Rejections
No Blocks
Neal M. Snow Wage History
Top Worker Reviews
Cipher Fast Reader
Survey on auditors - $10.00
Generous
Unrated
Approved
$22.73 / hour
00:26:24 / completion time
Pros
Requester made a hilarious comment at the end of the survey stating, "Please do not share the unique code with anyone else, as payment will only be made once per ID. I am trying to limit the number of people I disappoint in this life."Aside from that humorous moment, there was quite the read and rather simple questions that all functioned correctly, didn't intend to deceive and hardly the attention checks as long as you read so a quality survey / requester this person is!
Cons
DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Survey on auditors - $10.00
Generous
Unrated
Approved
$29.13 / hour
00:20:36 / completion time
Pros
Cons
Lots of intensive reading. After completing the demographics, I received "I'm sorry, you didn't pay close enough attention." So, either I missed an attention check or there was a code error. Since I had already completed the entire study at that point, I submitted with my WorkerID and sent a message.Requester rejected the HIT, but then emailed an apology for the error and asked if I would accept a Paypal payment. I responded back with the instructions to reverse a rejection and explained my preference for that method, instead.
Requester responded that the rejection was reversed.... but it wasn't. I sent instructions again.
Reversed ~24 hours.
ID provided does not match the unique ID provided at the end of the survey.
I am happy to discuss alternative payments further over email (nes315@lehigh.edu), as I know this is not a short study. However, I also need to collect enough responses for my study so I need to repost the responses. Thank you for your understanding.
This rejection was overturned!
Dwthur Fast Reader
Survey on auditors - $10.00
Generous
Excellent
Approved
$32.09 / hour
00:18:42 / completion time
Pros
HIT was interesting and required attention during the task, which is nice. Generous pay, and communicative requester -- an error initially caused me to be screened out at end, so I submitted w/ my ID and was rejected. Emailed requested and explained issue and the rejection was overturned. Would work for requester again!Cons