TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Adelaide CompCogSci

Verified
University of Bristol
  • Overview
  • Reviews 1521
  • HITs 157

Adelaide CompCogSci Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Adelaide CompCogSci Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Alexandra in VT Average Pace
Reviews: 8,350
Points: 5,826
Ratings: 671
Communication game (20-30 minutes) - $4.50 +2.25 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$30.00 / hour

00:13:30 / completion time

Pros

Much like the other HITs from this requester, this is a great one. Per usual, it pays well and is interesting. Play a game with another player, who you have 2 minutes to be matched with. If they don't connect, you'll still get paid in full. Once you're connected, you take turns assigning one of a few names they've provided, to a random object. You and your partner have to learn how to name things, based on how you work with each other. Another perk of the study is that you can win a bonus if you score in the top 10% of teams.

EDIT: 2.25 bonus for high score!

Cons

This might not pay quite as well if your partner was super slow, but even if the time was doubled, it would still be a "fair" paying HIT.
Jan 9, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,426
Play the Misinformation Game (20-30 minutes) - $5.00

Low

Unrated

Approved

$9.99 / hour

00:30:01 / completion time

Pros

Not really any pros to this hit but this was the layout - demographics - read instructions - Work through 16 rounds - answer one question and write a persuasive message in relation to that question containing some misinformation - there is a bonus offered of $10 for the most persuasive message in this experiment - this is great for those who find creative writing easy - could be done faster

Cons

Lots of writing - for those who struggle with writing I would say this time estimate in the title is way off - terribly underpaid in my opinion - I'm actually shocked that I managed to complete this hit as I did struggle with this - it would have been fairer pay if there were only 10 to complete and not 16!
Mar 21, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.

basketcasey Average Pace
Reviews: 2,721
Points: 3,055
Ratings: 569
Speeded decisions experiment (60 minutes) - $10.00

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$14.28 / hour

00:42:01 / completion time

Pros

Pay is pretty decent, but could be better for the amount of effort required.
Can submit the puzzle pages early if you finish before the timer.
Gives you specific number of trials and the number of trials you have completed.

Cons

Requires a lot of concentration and effort.
First section consists of 4 timed puzzle solving tasks, then the second section consists of verbal and memory tasks in an Inquisit-like manner.
It felt like this went on forever and the second half was very repetitive.
Nov 6, 2018 | 7 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Adelaide CompCogSci's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Adelaide CompCogSci


A2UKL52R7I6BX7 MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

The University of Melbourne The University of Adelaide

Recently Reviewed HITs


Adelaide Basic Qualification HIT
Answer a survey about trust, truth, and politics (5-10min)
Answer some quick questions about hypothetical situations (3-5 min)
Belief in health claims (4-8 minutes)
Categorization Study (5-7mins)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact