TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Bright--Side

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 211
  • HITs 110

Bright--Side Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

Blocks Reported
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Bright--Side Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

dgrochester55 Average Pace
Reviews: 668
Points: 2,322
Ratings: 508
Describe an object of a 3D Scene. $BONUS=0.04$ - $0.08 +0.05 bonus

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$10.40 / hour

00:00:45 / completion time
  • Account Blocked

Pros

Pay is better after bonuses, fun to do

Cons

I received bonuses in the past with comments such as "great job" I went to do the hits again today and discovered that i was hard blocked. This seems to be pretty passive aggressive to me and unwarranted based on the message that I got. To make it worse, the ratio is partially depending on the people guess and you could end up suffering if you get someone who does not guess well or random clicks.

Edit-6/4 Despite the previous communication and the promise to address the block, they emailed back stating that they refused to remove the block.

I worked for them for months with a few bonuses always saying great job, yet this happens. Not a trustworthy or consistent requester.

Edit 10/20-I saw that they were back after a hiatus, checked out of curiosity and saw that I was still blocked. Based on this, his approval rating and his response to me on TO a few months back, I must reiterate again, that these hits are not worth the risk of a hard block.

Advice to Requester

Create a qual instead of hard blocking. Don't send mixed messages on how you feel that someone is performing
Jun 2, 2020 | 10 workers found this helpful.

EugeneStargazer New Reviewer
Reviews: 2
Points: 27
Ratings: 4
Explain why an image makes you feel a certain way. (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) - $0.07

Fair

Unrated

Rejected (Some)

$12.60 / hour

00:00:20 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

I find these fast and easy to complete when I'm "in the zone" and frequently find myself hitting minimum wage for my state. I don't always make that of course and the pay could be better but the work is painless. Another plus is the requestor is very clear that the descriptions need to be at least 8 words-- in fact they politely contacted me about a few of mine that did not make the mark. I've found communicating with this requester to be a good experience so far. So all in all I think the requestor pay is mostly fair enough.

Cons

The biggest annoyance and slow-down is that the instructions don't stay collapsed and every HIT you spend precious seconds scrolling down to the work.

Advice to Requester

Fix the instructions so they stay collapsed during HITS, and we'll get more done!
Jun 12, 2021 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Larsanix Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 333
Points: 933
Ratings: 127
How do you feel when seeing a painting?(WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) - $0.07

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$11.45 / hour

00:00:22 / completion time

Pros

These are generally good to do when it is slow, and there's pretty much nothing better to do. I do use a script and a structured process though that helps me complete these a little faster, so the hourly might be a bit lower for someone else, however,
I've done several hundreds of these for this requester and they have never been rejected, so I'd say as long as you follow the rules and don't try to skimp out, you should be fine.

Cons

250 cap(17.50 which isn't bad if you actually cap).
There are usually caps on these, but the requester does state that if you would like to work on more you can contact him.
There is also mild writing involved.
Mar 29, 2020 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Bright--Side's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Bright--Side


AZVWGREVAX56J MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Assume the power to make imaginative/arbitrary images of yourself. Describe the photos you would make in short sentences.
Choose 1 of 2 chair images, given a third chair.
Choose 1 of 3 images given a short utterance.
Describe a painting. (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Describe a sofa given three!

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact