TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Wyatt Lee

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 50
  • HITs 19

Wyatt Lee Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays very badly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Wyatt Lee Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Larsanix Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 333
Points: 933
Ratings: 127
Pick the best category - $0.01 +1.00 bonus

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

Easy if you can look at someone and automatically tell what race/age/sex they are.


After doing several HITs for this requester, they bonused 1.00 which I felt was very generous of them considering I felt their HITs were underpaid. However, they are very easy to do, so I kept working on them. 1.00 added to the HITs that I've already completed makes these worthwhile after all, and I don't expect any more than that because of how brainless these tasks are.

Cons

Mar 25, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Janya Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 298
Points: 493
Ratings: 100
Pick the best category - $0.02

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$4.24 / hour

00:00:17 / completion time

Pros

Cons

They look easy enough, but then answering one question creates more boxes to be completed. And if you say UNSURE to any of the questions, you have to type WHY you are unsure.

Also, not sure what is up with this batch, but there are a few thousand of them; you can't just click to accept one - you have to use PANDA to get one. Similar experience from other folks on this batch.
Apr 22, 2025

Soldan Average Pace
Reviews: 830
Points: 863
Ratings: 219
Pick the best category - $0.01

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$1.16 / hour

00:00:31 / completion time

Pros

Cons

super underpaid for the amount of data points. Tested to see if it was worth it for numbers, but uhhh nope. These need to be shunned and not done.
Mar 19, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Wyatt Lee's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Wyatt Lee


AYR2RPP8QH0M7 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Pick the best category

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact