TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Neuroeconomics & Decision-Making Laboratory

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 5
  • HITs 5

Neuroeconomics & Decision-Making Laboratory Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Neuroeconomics & Decision-Making Laboratory Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Penelope Fast Reader
Reviews: 10,545
Points: 10,999
Ratings: 2,846
Participate in a Gamified Experiment to Assess Decision Making. - $1.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.50 / hour

00:24:00 / completion time

Pros

Cons

The time is pretty accurate. You could possibly shave off a minute or so at most. There is a bonus up to $6 and as low as 40 cents. One trial is randomly selected for this. Some are almost impossible to win. The size of the goal changes to nearly the size of the two objects you're trying to get inside of it (within two seconds) and one object is very slinky. Even if you get some in the goal, you will be told you went too fast and those don't count. To me, that was unethical as it reduced my chance of getting a bonus and even potentially being paid fairly. It happened on at least six trials and this was mentioned nowhere in the hit. It only stated that you had to get the objects in the goal WITHIN two seconds. Try it at your own risk. This is the worst Johns Hopkins hits I've attempted. I know they generally pay unfairly but this was beyond that.
Jun 9, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

RuneScim Average Pace
Reviews: 130
Points: 63
Ratings: 3
Participate in a Gamified Experiment to Assess Decision Making. - $1.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.46 / hour

00:24:26 / completion time

Pros

Absolutely none.

Cons

Absolute garbage. Tracking experiment that doesn't allow you to move fast. Even if you get most of your trials correct, you still have a high chance at getting a crap bonus that won't make up for this. Also, 20 practice trials. This HIT is horribly underpaid.

Advice to Requester

Pay more of a base fee or at least a bonus for getting X amount successfully. Ask yourself before you put out a HIT if you'd be alright working for that kind of money.
Jun 9, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Starr Fast Reader
Reviews: 151
Points: 234
Ratings: 32
Participate in a Gamified Experiment to Assess Decision Making. - $3.00 +7.55 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$33.49 / hour

00:18:54 / completion time
Dec 14, 2020

Want to see Neuroeconomics & Decision-Making Laboratory's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Neuroeconomics & Decision-Making Laboratory


AV70ZQXRTMU71 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Participate in a Gamified Experiment to Assess Decision Making.

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact