TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Surveys PSU

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 58
  • HITs 4

Surveys PSU Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Slowly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Surveys PSU Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,419
Points: 12,340
Ratings: 1,213
Brief Survey - $1.20

Generous

Good

Approved

$28.80 / hour

00:02:30 / completion time

Pros

Easy word association task. 15 words in total. Short demographics at the end.

Edit (rejection 9/29): avoid this requester. Reject happy.

Edit (reversal 9/29): sending them a message after completing the HIT proved to work in my favor. I received a response shortly after I saw my rejection. They willingly reversed the rejection based on my "careful attention to detail."

Cons

96% approval rating with recent noted rejections on TV for this same HIT. I made sure to move every slider, though one task did not have a smiley face so hoping that doesn't negatively impact their grading.
Sep 28, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

charlesHM Fast Reader
Reviews: 5,544
Points: 3,317
Ratings: 224
Brief Survey - $1.20

Good

Unrated

Pending

$23.48 / hour

00:03:04 / completion time

Pros

Quite brief indeed.

Cons

There was very little engagement. Most of the statements you need to post emotions on are completely emotionless, so most of them are just "none of the above". Pretty poor word choice, in my opinion. Not much there for me to really feel.
Sep 28, 2021

test ing Proficient Worker
Reviews: 9,635
Points: 5,692
Ratings: 656
Brief Survey - $1.15

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected

$6.32 / hour

00:10:55 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejection on a HIT where you view a word and associate a smiley face with it.
Aug 25, 2021 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Surveys PSU's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Surveys PSU


ATWZ6WRT55TGN MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Brief Survey

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact