TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Geoffrey Leonardelli

Is this your requester account?
University of Toronto
  • Overview
  • Reviews 339
  • HITs 49

Geoffrey Leonardelli Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Geoffrey Leonardelli Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

AfterDarkMark Average Pace
Reviews: 1,229
Points: 4,923
Ratings: 483
Group Memberships - $7.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$20.69 / hour

00:21:45 / completion time

Pros

Well paid. Can be done faster (or slower).

Cons

Writing.

Guessing I was on the above average side speed wise (?), so can definitely be done slower too. Would guess average speed is higher, but I could be wrong. I may have been average paced cause wasn't in "speed demon" mode lol.

Also, I may have been overthinking things to start, and I find surveys like this a bit difficult because they are essentially asking us to stereotype people to get through it (or else end up "banging your head against a wall"), even if we don't feel that way... IDK, so I was kind of switching my approach throughout.

Maybe this will make sense when you do it, but without giving much away, we are essentially asked to characterize groups we are a part of and then the opposite or other groups. So, I found it difficult because I see a lot of groups as really diverse, and to come up with adjectives to describe a whole group is hard to do, without using stereotypes that we may not believe in at all, but the data obviously won't show that. I made a note of it to requester at the end.

Advice to Requester

I guess see my comment above about why this was difficult for me. Not sure what you're studying, but you may want to think about tweaking this study if it isn't getting at what you are trying to research. Or maybe get more feedback from workers. Or, maybe I just overthought things. Sorry if so.
Mar 6, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

dan Average Pace
Reviews: 8,517
Points: 8,988
Ratings: 1,987
Group Memberships - $7.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$20.72 / hour

00:21:43 / completion time

Pros

didn't take 40 minutes - as it stated it might.
hourly wage isn't terrible

Cons

Holy cow was that tedious.
-felt it would never end
-no progress bar whatseoever
-incredibly repetitive.
-Requires typing a bunch of adjectives that describe certain groups
-an awful time.
Mar 6, 2019 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Penelope Fast Reader
Reviews: 10,545
Points: 10,999
Ratings: 2,846
Allocation Game - $0.00 +1.00 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$8.96 / hour

00:06:42 / completion time

Pros

Cons

$1 base pay is bonused. Possibility for an additional bonus between 0-1 based on choices. Garbage. Timed writing prompt (2-3 minutes). Bubbles. Must wait to be paired with a partner. No one was available so I got a bot which I think everyone did. Of course that meant no bonus because bots need money. Deceitful.
Aug 14, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Geoffrey Leonardelli's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Geoffrey Leonardelli


AT42ELXOHSYWL MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

Macquarie University

Recently Reviewed HITs


A simple survey(~ 10 minutes)
A simple survey(~ 3 minutes)
A simple survey(~ 4 minutes)
A simple survey(~ 8 minutes)
Allocation Game

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact