TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Marketing

Is this your requester account?
The University of Arizona
  • Overview
  • Reviews 92
  • HITs 13

Marketing Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Marketing Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

AfterDarkMark Average Pace
Reviews: 1,232
Points: 4,929
Ratings: 483
Answer a survey - $1.00

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$19.89 / hour

00:03:01 / completion time

Pros

Super short. Not sure if this was a different version than the person who reviewed this earlier? But I wasn't rushing either. Was just really short and concise.

Cons

EDIT: confirmed that this was supposed to be the 50 cent version. I had it in my queue too, but threw it back once I started it because i realized it was exactly the same. They must have accidentally posted it at 1$, because then it popped up at 50 cents a few minutes later.

I am doubling the time it took me to reflect what the pay would be at 50 cents.... Not sure how the people who run turkerview feel about this, but I think it's the correct thing to do, since the $1 posting seemed to be a mistake and I don't think it will be back at that rate.

It's similar to a review (I forget the requester) where it's obvious the requester posted it for 10 or 20x the amount that it's always at (screwed up the decimal), but that review stands and skews the average hourly or did for a long time by like 100 dollars lol. Informed the people who run the site about it cause it seemed pretty obvious, but it was never changed, etc.
Apr 18, 2019

bmt Proficient Worker
Reviews: 14,466
Points: 12,517
Ratings: 1,347
Testing how consumers enter data on website (write a brief essays and answer questions) - $1.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$26.47 / hour

00:02:16 / completion time

Pros

I have no idea what the survey content and the survey title have to do with each other at all.

Cons

Brief experiential writing component, no stated minimum or timer. Couple of anagrams.
Aug 27, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Reviews: 12,539
Points: 11,042
Ratings: 1,408
Testing how consumers enter data on website (write a brief essays and answer questions) - $0.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$25.71 / hour

00:01:10 / completion time

Pros

Cons

writing (no character requirement), anagrams, brief timed pages
Feb 1, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Marketing's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Marketing


ASMH4T0FKLYLU MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer 30 questions and write a brief essay
Answer a survey
For pet owners only: Write two brief essays and answer questions
New study on how consumers enter data on website (write a brief essays and answer questions)
Participate in a brief survey - this will take 5 minutes on average

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact