Fondazione Bruno Kessler Ratings
Workers feel this requester pays very badly
Approves Quickly
No Blocks
Fondazione Bruno Kessler Wage History
Top Worker Reviews
Larsanix Unreliably Fast
Social media hate speech annotation in tweets (explicit content) - $0.03
Low
Unacceptable
Rejected (Unfair)
$8.31 / hour
00:00:13 / completion time
- HIT Rejected
Pros
Cons
Edit: 5/22 after several attempts the requester still hasn't responded.Claims they will reject if you miss their "gold standard question", which could be any one of those because there are more than one that are really just jibberish. It is also counterproductive to the task since it appears to be subjective in nature.
At just about 0.02 more these would be worth it, especially with the threats of rejection.
Edit: Instantly rejected just one of my HITs claiming I missed the said golden question, so I went back to review it. There were only two offensive sentences in the HIT and the rest were not. They're rejecting HITs that are totally subjective in nature. Pretty sure they'll keep my data too.
As a matter of fact, this is the question they ask further justifying my claim.
Does not reveal content that would reveal information/help anyone blindly complete the hits: https://gyazo.com/84bd1cb4477b015e5e733d4d3fdceda9
After doing some research it appears this may be the person behind these HITs, as there are several papers written that mention the content that was used in the HITs;
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7b95vjEAAAAJ&hl=en
With all of this under their belt, it is just shameful that they are putting out NLP hits touting a subjective nature, and then rejecting based on whether our opinions match their own. In this case, it would be best to just use data based on what they think and avoid posting anything on this platform.
Advice to Requester
Raise the price, don't threaten rejections for missing something so mundane. If you're really worried about quality, make a qual test for these instead.
May 8, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.
Marla Relaxed Pace
Hate speech - $0.05
Low
Unacceptable
Rejected (Unfair)
$1.73 / hour
00:01:44 / completion time
- HIT Rejected
Pros
Stay away from this requester.I completed 12 hits.
11 got approved in less than an hour. Then suddenly I got 3 rejections even though I have followed instructions to the letter.
I have them open on my second screen and I look at them for reference.
It says I've missed 'the golden question'.
I sent email to requester. If I hear back I will update. But I doubt it.
Cons
Vague rejection reasons.Advice to Requester
It seems you are rejecting based on your subjective standards.
Apr 21, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.
TheOneTrueChuck Fast Reader
Offensive content detection - Covid-19 - $0.05
Unrated
Unrated
Approved
$3.67 / hour
00:00:49 / completion time
Pros
Cons
Low paying garbage.Rejects submissions on subjective (opinion-based) hits.
Advice to Requester
If you're going to be picky, raise your rates. Your 82% approval rate on subjective hits indicates that you're probably rejecting people for not agreeing with your own opinion.
Jan 21, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.