TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

QnAVerification

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 96
  • HITs 205

QnAVerification Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

QnAVerification Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Yoyo Average Pace
Reviews: 68
Points: 1,899
Ratings: 186
Read question/instruction and answer pair and decide (WARNING: HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised) - $0.20

Fair

Unacceptable

Rejected

$6.99 / hour

00:01:43 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

None

Cons

Rating 10 questions for 20 cents doesn't seem so bad, but the HIT is impossible to complete as is.

Here is a list of some of the questions I encountered:

"appuyer routine flash d information"
"pour ma"
"mets spiderman noir sur monster skillet"
"excuse me"
"paillette kevin"

and so on.

You are then presented with an "answer" (for example "The station kevin Gates on website music, playing first big gangsta by kevin Gates, I love to make it to Bring Me My Peak." to the question "paillette kevin") and are given three choices on whether or not the question was answered.

* Yes
* No
* Question does not make sense

I had to choose the last option for almost every question, because almost none of them were questions, and the remaining few was just "who is macklemore" repeated as separate questions over and over.

The work I did was rejected for "Too many incorrectly graded Questions and Answers", which proves me me this Requestor doesn't actually check the work, and is only looking to see if people answer "Yes" or "No" enough times. (Which, I did select "Yes" for the questions about Macklemore, as those actually were questions that had legitimate answers given for them.)

Avoid this Requestor like the plague.

Advice to Requester

Completely overhaul your HIT. Actually check the work you're rejecting.
Nov 8, 2021 | 7 workers found this helpful.

Randomacts Proficient Worker
Reviews: 2,993
Points: 4,057
Ratings: 1,205
Read a question and answer pair and make judgement.(WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) - $0.02

Underpaid

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$4.80 / hour

00:00:15 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

All hits rejected
Jun 21, 2019 | 13 workers found this helpful.
QnAVerification (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Too many incorrectly graded Questions and Answers


Mayur Tanwani New Reviewer
Reviews: 5
Points: 23
Ratings: 11
प्रश्न और दिए गए उत्तर को पढ़ें, यह निर्णय लेने के लिए कुछ शोध करें कि उत्तर सही है या नहीं. - $0.20

Unrated

Unacceptable

Pending

$4.80 / hour

00:02:30 / completion time

Pros

HIT is easy and fast.

Cons

Hit got rejected seconds after completing it. Rejection was unfair as I'm pretty sure I did the hit very carefully. I took a chance even after seeing other reviews and rejections. Don't make the same mistake as I did. If you really care a lot about your approval rate, don't do this hit. They will reject random hit.

Advice to Requester

Their automated system of determining whether the hit is rejected or approved is not accurate, They should review it.
Jul 16, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see QnAVerification's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

QnAVerification


ARBONZQKWK7S1 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Leggi la domanda e la risposta fornita, quindi esegui qualche ricerca per valutare se la risposta è corretta.
Leia a pergunta e a resposta fornecida, faça alguma pesquisa para julgar se a resposta está correta.
Lisez une paire de questions et réponses et faites-vous une opinion.
Listen to short audio clips (15 seconds)
Read a question and answer pair and make judgement. (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact