TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 24
  • HITs 64

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Slowly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

sarin Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 10,091
Points: 10,085
Ratings: 1,706
Choose the more plausible hypothesis. - $0.13

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$3.97 / hour

00:01:58 / completion time

Pros

Cons

This researcher is affiliated with Allen AI, as he uses the same short stories for his data collection that are also used in Alexandria and Aristo batches.

This researcher also has a history of releasing batches to MTurk before, as he posted work under a somewhat fairly waged Noah Turk account (A33HQRBIBYLHXA) and subsequently released a research paper with Facebook AI using data from said batches.

Considering this context, it is insulting that this researcher would release borderline slave wage batches using the English-speaking country qualifications, use a time-wasting, borderline broken template, and load the batches with threats of disqualification and/or rejection.
Mar 29, 2020 | 7 workers found this helpful.

WhoCouldItBe Average Pace
Reviews: 22
Points: 70
Ratings: 10
Inference from the Text! - $0.12

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$2.41 / hour

00:02:59 / completion time

Pros

It's an easy HIT, starts with a qualifier for 5 questions. Not a big deal, do it once and done.

Cons

The return/review for this HIT said 5 questions. Figured I would still give it a shot. It's 5 qualifying questions, then 12 regular. This could be a great batch, however, the hourly is horrid.

Advice to Requester

This is a good HIT in general, the pay is not though. The qualifier at the beginning is good, the 12 questions after not so much.
Mar 3, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

scoot412 Fast Reader
Reviews: 1,210
Points: 5,460
Ratings: 737
Inference from the Text! - $0.13

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$2.15 / hour

00:03:38 / completion time

Pros

none

Cons

First you have to qualify by completing five examples, which is ok, I guess. But, the actual task has probably ten of these tasks.
As an added bonus, lots of threats of rejection in the instructions. Total garbage

Advice to Requester

The amount of work you require for 13-cents is ridiculous.
Apr 1, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


AOKY86TX0Y2VQ MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Choose the more plausible hypothesis.
Inference from the Text!
Inference from the Text! (Special)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact