TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Noah Turk

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 256
  • HITs 174

Noah Turk Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Noah Turk Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Lumius Proficient Worker
Reviews: 1,379
Points: 3,289
Ratings: 336
Annotate attributes of entities in a fantasy text adventure game world. (pilot) - $2.40

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$21.49 / hour

00:06:42 / completion time

Pros

-A Noah Turk that actually works.
-Very similar to other requester attribute labeling tasks.
-The first and second ones I did approved, so posting a third to update/review-will update as rejected/approved.
-Wet, dry, hot, cold, big, small, cheap, expensive, rough, smooth, light, heavy, light, dark, liquid, solid are all attributes that I used that have approved.
-If you like DND/MTG/Fantasy, ranking things on dexterity, charisma etc. will be second nature.
-Requester has added more information from feedback, but still severely lacking.
-Quick approval.

Cons

-Very, very limited instructions. I pretty much did one to guess, based on their model.
-Drag and drop 4 items on multiple scales for ranking their attributes.
-Requires you to come up with 4 custom labels/attributes for each of those same 4 items.
-If you're not creative, this will take a bit to come up with labels that aren't already in use.
-You have to drag the flags so that the text head is entirely onto the scale, even if your ranking would put the "flagpole" at an extreme end.
Sep 14, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

cjqg Proficient Worker
Reviews: 4,124
Points: 2,583
Ratings: 112
Chat with a fellow conversationalist! - $2.50

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$30.20 / hour

00:04:58 / completion time

Pros

Wow, a Noah Turk HIT that works. Submit button...it summitted. Wow.

The bot in both the HITs that I did was pretty accurate which made the conversations streamlined and quick.

Cons

Can't believe I'm saying this but....but....none, it worked.

Perhaps false confidence that other Noah Turk HITs will work in the future which is folly. Noah Turk will regain it's place in the 'created 25 days ago' broken category soon enough. Enjoy while it lasts lads!
Aug 21, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,466
Points: 12,377
Ratings: 1,215
Chat with a fellow conversationalist! - $2.50

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$28.13 / hour

00:05:20 / completion time

Pros

Finally got a Noah Turk to not only load, but also got one to submit.

Pretty easy conversation with a chatbot. Chatbot didn't go off the rails and we kept a decent conversation going until the end.

Cons

I have attempted this HIT before, but have not been able to submit. Not sure what I did differently this time. Would be nice if there were clearly defined instructions inside the HIT, not just in the preview screen before accepting the HIT.
Aug 21, 2021

Want to see Noah Turk's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Noah Turk


ANKPP7A02GX3 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


"Determining character motivations in a Fantasy Text World"
Annotate an interaction between two objects.
Annotate an interaction between two objects. (pilot)
Annotate an interaction between two objects. (uncapped)
Annotate an interaction between two objects. (UPDATED INSTRUCTIONS - please expand)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact