TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Wynter INC

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 705
  • HITs 789

Wynter INC Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Wynter INC Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

darx888 Proficient Worker
Reviews: 684
Points: 836
Ratings: 51
May 20: Landing page - Rate sentences; Test length: 7 blocks - $3.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$5.78 / hour

00:36:21 / completion time

Pros

potential for a significant bonus if you are thorough in your responses

Cons

lots and lots of writing

EDIT: so after multiple times trying to contact them, i have not received a response or a bonus. i spent a good 35 minutes on this hit while typing out paragraphs for each section and was expecting a hefty bonus based on their introductory page and information. looks like they are just another shit requester. since this hit, i have caught a few more of their hits, but refused to do them since i was waiting to see if, and how much, they would bonus me. if they were fair, i would have received at least a $5 bonus for my effort. stay away from these bums, they are giving empty promises in the hopes of extracting written responses for pennies on the dollar.

Advice to Requester

pay out the bonuses you promised. answer your messages on mturk
May 20, 2020 | 10 workers found this helpful.

KatieinPGH Careful Reader
Reviews: 547
Points: 623
Ratings: 54
Jun 3: CXL Institute - Rate sentences; Test length: 3 blocks - $2.50

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$8.17 / hour

00:18:22 / completion time

Pros

These are fun HIT's for me. The websites you review can be interesting and you already know that you'll be typing a lot, so there aren't any surprises.

Cons

The pay is starting to really drop on these. Additionally, despite typing a LOT in every single box, putting in a lot of effort, I've not seen a bonus yet. I don't know if anyone is actually getting bonuses or if they are using that as a false claim to make sure we put more effort in (which we would be doing anyway).

Advice to Requester

I've added paragraphs of suggestions and opinions with no feedback, then later I've done a second HIT that was the same site but with my suggestions in place - that should have been bonus worthy. Also, the prices are dropping for the same block amount, which is pretty dodgy.
Jun 3, 2020 | 4 workers found this helpful.

KatieinPGH Careful Reader
Reviews: 547
Points: 623
Ratings: 54
Jun 30: Anolon Copy - Rate sentences; Test length: 7 blocks - $3.50

Good

Unrated

Approved

$12.52 / hour

00:16:46 / completion time

Pros

The HIT's are approved pretty quickly and if you enjoy typing and critiquing products, this is perfect for you!

Cons

I enjoy the HIT's, but as a lot of us have stated, they do NOT pay bonuses. Additionally, They have yet to respond to any of my email, seems like this is a common theme. The pay is dropped down to $3.50 and $2.50 from as high as $10 for fewer blocks.

Advice to Requester

Get back to your workers! When we email questions or concerns, you ignoring us doesn't do a lick of good other than give your ID a bad rep. Are you ever considering paying bonuses? I've gone from spending 30-40 minutes on critiques to 15 minutes because I need to keep it at a good hourly pay to make it worth doing the typing.
Jun 30, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Wynter INC's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Wynter INC


ANDVDK73INIIA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


About Page - Rate sentences; Test length: 7 blocks
airfocus home page test - Rate sentences; Test length: 7 blocks
Apr 12: Cameo 5 Reasons - Rate sentences; Test length: 3 blocks
Apr 12: Klinio - Short 3-minute feedback test: Rate a single area on a website
Apr 13: 6 Big Reasons LP - Rate sentences; Test length: 3 blocks

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact