TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Emily Grabowski

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 5
  • HITs 1

Emily Grabowski Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Emily Grabowski Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

MirrorMan Careful Reader
Reviews: 1,207
Points: 1,860
Ratings: 406
Linguistics Survey - $5.00

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$16.74 / hour

00:17:55 / completion time

Pros

Seemed like it was going to be an interesting HIT
Pay is decent as it does not take as long as the consent form states.

Cons

Tell what word you hear from two repeated similar sounding words that end up sounding the same after about the first three minutes. Then the same thing, but with "short" and "long" tones. It does not seem like they are actually looking to see if you know if the tones are long or short as it says you are wrong nearly every time.
Says it will not pay you if you are wrong too many times.
Fully expecting a rejection on this HIT.

Advice to Requester

Do not threaten rejections and then pull that foolishness that you did on the second stage of the hit. There were long tones that were being classified as incorrect when the proper choice was made and short tones being marked as incorrect when the proper choice was made.
May 24, 2021 | 5 workers found this helpful.

johnxyz Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,562
Points: 13,399
Ratings: 1,298
Linguistics Survey - $5.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$21.69 / hour

00:13:50 / completion time

Pros

Next-day approval

Cons

Very repetitive audio ratings (2 blocks @ ~5 min each)
Subjective at times / Threatens rejection for incorrect answers
Feb 11, 2022

Turkmom86 Average Pace
Reviews: 648
Points: 355
Ratings: 43
Linguistics Survey - $5.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$21.51 / hour

00:13:57 / completion time
Feb 11, 2022

Want to see Emily Grabowski's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Emily Grabowski


AM7DFJRUL9HEA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Linguistics Survey

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact