TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

BaileyLab

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 65
  • HITs 161

BaileyLab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

BaileyLab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

BluAngel Average Pace
Reviews: 2,384
Points: 1,251
Ratings: 139
Short Stories - Batch 47 (100) PART 1 - read short stories and answer questions - $0.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$1.07 / hour

00:27:55 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Wow - that was a super annoying hit. There was no progress bar. My hand just hurts from the repetitive clicking of reading a single sentence to have to click to be able to read the next sentence in the paragraph. The first session I just did is so is low paying, I considered throwing it back many times but held on because of the promise of future better paying and shorter surveys plus I was already in the middle of it. I will think twice before accepting any future hits from this requester. It is supposed to be a total of 4 sessions of 40 minutes. For a total of $5.00, the takes a whole month to collect on. So it is total crap.

From the requestor:
This study is a longitudinal study, which requires this initial session, plus 3 follow-up tests after various amounts of time (1 day, 1 week, and 1 month - from the date of the first session).

The follow-up sessions will be much quicker than this first session and you will earn increasingly more money after each completed session. 

The first session (today) is worth $0.50.
The second session (tomorrow) is worth $1.00.
The third session (exactly 1 week from 1st session) is worth $1.50.
The fourth session (exactly 1 month from 1st session) is worth $2.00.
After the 4th session, you will have earned $5.00 for approximately 40 minutes of total participation time.
Apr 16, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Short Stories - Batch 34 (74) PART 1 - read short stories and answer questions - $0.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$1.69 / hour

00:17:47 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Lol. This is literally the time you will get assuming you are a quick reader. No progress bar, this entire survey hinges on the promise that the followup studies, valued at 1, 1.50 and 2.00, will be much shorter than this initial investment. Tomorrow and the following days will tell if this was a complete waste of time.

Regardless, what a terrible way to get people to do your longitudinal study and entice them to do the subsequent studies, by tossing a copy pennies their way for an estimated 30 minutes worth of work.

I did this survey not to benefit and reward the requester for a poorly paid survey, but to make sure people are aware of this trashy practice.
Mar 24, 2020 | 5 workers found this helpful.

savetheunlikely Fast Reader
Reviews: 9,023
Points: 5,269
Ratings: 369
Short Stories - Batch 9 (49) PART 1 - read short stories and answer questions - $0.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$0.86 / hour

00:34:50 / completion time

Pros

getting to write this review.

Cons

WHAT THE EVER LOVING $(#*. I thought that MAYBE it would be one of those HITs that says 30 minutes but it's not 30 minutes but it was NOT. Freakin' terrible. Doesn't matter what the followups pay
Apr 8, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see BaileyLab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

BaileyLab


ALR6RTCCI54GC MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer questions about a short video (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Answer questions about short video clips
CCTV Video(~ 15 minutes)
Childhood abuse and your memories
How familiar are these activities?

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact