TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Paulo Jose

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 18
  • HITs 11

Paulo Jose Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Paulo Jose Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DeckersLLC Average Pace
Reviews: 1,139
Points: 916
Ratings: 47
Survey and argumentation on eating habits - PART 2 - $3.70

Generous

Good

Rejected (Fair)

$23.62 / hour

00:09:24 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Easy to do survey with generous pay
Paid a bonus for helping them understand the system, despite keeping my original HIT rejected

Cons

Rejected because I did not complete PART 1 of their survey, which their response to me did say that it was mentioned in the instructions several times. Fair enough, but most of us do tens or even hundreds of surveys, and the instructions tend to get repetitive, thus are often skipped. I offered feedback (mentioned in the advice section).

Advice to Requester

Use the qualification system! If you don't want anybody that hasn't done part 1 of your survey series to do part 2, require a qualification to accept part 2 that is only granted upon successful completion of part 1. It's no skin off my back, I've got plenty of buffer for the occasional rejection, but there are others where that single rejection could wreck their work potential here, thus excluding potentially great workers (and survey data) for stupid reasons.
Apr 25, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.

TKNO Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 9,646
Points: 5,715
Ratings: 724
Survey and argumentation on eating habits - $5.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$17.66 / hour

00:16:59 / completion time

Pros

good pay
easy enough

Cons

new requester
no approval history
threats of rejections for taking different versions because god forbid a bunch of PHD's figure out how to use the exclusion qual features of mturk
100 word writing prompt

Advice to Requester

figger it out!!
Mar 18, 2022 | 4 workers found this helpful.

ReebsC5 Average Pace
Reviews: 2,435
Points: 1,950
Ratings: 149
Survey and argumentation on eating habits - $5.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$18.99 / hour

00:15:48 / completion time

Pros

follow up in 5 weeks

Cons

argumentative writing (100 word min)
Jul 1, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Paulo Jose's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Paulo Jose


AK1ERG8WCUFIZ MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Survey and argumentation on eating habits
Survey and argumentation on eating habits - PART 2
Survey and argumentation on eating habits (CAN, US, UK, AUS, NZ)
Survey and argumentation on eating habits (US, UK, AUS, NZ)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact