TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Noah Turk

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 123
  • HITs 270

Noah Turk Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Noah Turk Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Nikoratos Average Pace
Reviews: 85
Points: 298
Ratings: 27
Survey about Well-Being (Part 1) - $2.50

Generous

Excellent

Approved

$29.22 / hour

00:05:08 / completion time

Pros

UPDATE 8/30

Turns out I made a mistake by not advancing the screen after receiving my code. Something I've done before but have always managed to catch until now. That's my bad. The requester responded 9 days after I first contacted them and explained in the email they sent me,

"Sorry for the delay in responding!

I manually checked all the approvals and I think I know what happened. Some people forgot to hit "Next" to actually submit the survey in Qualtrics. Therefore, no data was recorded at all and I was unable to approve. Sorry if that happened to you! I went back and tried to make it very clear in the instructions that the "Next" button had to be pressed after I noticed a few people's results were not saved.

I will be launching a couple other surveys like this one in the near future and will pay out the same amount. Keep an eye out for them if you're interested in taking the survey again."

They reversed the rejection and went on to explain the odd feedback I mentioned in the original review,
"Also, just wanted to further apologize because I didn't realize the rejected is sent to Turkers as "x". In the instructions for approvals it doesn't clarify there is supposed to be feedback in this box instead of just marking it as approved or rejected! I'll make sure to provide feedback in the future to rejected HITs."

I in turn apologized for my mistake, thanked them, and am updating the review to reflect how things played out. Whoever it is pulling the strings behind the account on this one seems like good people and I wanted to make sure I owned my part and gave them credit for theirs.
************************
Original Review
************************
This is one of those fill in all the bubbles about your feelings surveys. Not a terrible one. I completed the survey with no problems whatsoever, received my completion code, and submitted the HIT.

Cons

UPDATE 8/30

Turns out I made a mistake by not advancing the screen after receiving my code. Something I've done before but have always managed to catch until now. That's my bad. The requester responded 9 days after I first contacted them and explained in the email they sent me,

"Sorry for the delay in responding!

I manually checked all the approvals and I think I know what happened. Some people forgot to hit "Next" to actually submit the survey in Qualtrics. Therefore, no data was recorded at all and I was unable to approve. Sorry if that happened to you! I went back and tried to make it very clear in the instructions that the "Next" button had to be pressed after I noticed a few people's results were not saved.

I will be launching a couple other surveys like this one in the near future and will pay out the same amount. Keep an eye out for them if you're interested in taking the survey again."

They reversed the rejection and went on to explain the odd feedback I mentioned in the original review,
"Also, just wanted to further apologize because I didn't realize the rejected is sent to Turkers as "x". In the instructions for approvals it doesn't clarify there is supposed to be feedback in this box instead of just marking it as approved or rejected! I'll make sure to provide feedback in the future to rejected HITs."

I in turn apologized for my mistake, thanked them, and am updating the review to reflect how things played out. Whoever it is pulling the strings behind the account on this one seems like good people and I wanted to make sure I owned my part and gave them credit for theirs.

************************
Original Review
************************
Rejected for unknown reason on a HIT that I encountered zero difficulties completing. No useful feedback given and survey was of a type with no right or wrong answers so I'm reaching out to them for clarification.

I don't know how likely a rejection is but it's certainly a possibility. YMMV

Requester feedback on the rejection is "x"
Seriously. That's what it says under feedback.
"x"

The survey is titled Survey about Well-Being. My own well being. You'd think I would be an authority on the subject. Obviously Noah knows me better than I know myself because 'x'.

Contacting Requester in order to get value for x. Will update in event of a response.

Advice to Requester

The response took much longer than I would have liked but was of good quality when it was received. Requester explained and then did me a solid when they didn't have to.
Aug 13, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,427
Task - Correct AI model - $0.30 +2.00 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$16.76 / hour

00:08:14 / completion time

Pros

Read instructions - work through the quiz, if you fail you will just be compensated 20c if you proceed to the main part you can earn $2.00 - the main part work through 10 tasks as per the instructions at the beginning - answer questions about the task - demographics - I have put the $2.00 down as a bonus as it stated I should be paid that amount, I will update

Cons

May 10, 2022

sarin Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 10,091
Points: 10,085
Ratings: 1,706
Survey about Well-Being (Part 2) - $2.00

Fair

Unrated

Pending

$51.80 / hour

00:02:19 / completion time

Pros

Answer generic psych questions about yourself, then receive code

Cons

One question per page for at least 70 questions

A lot of the questions seem to repeat theirselves, and are given to you with no sense of continuity

Survey assumes that you took the first part of this before, and has no quals to lock people that didn't take the first survey out
Sep 26, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Noah Turk's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Noah Turk


AH2Z5UD121QDV MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Evaluating Music Sound Quality
Help Improve AI Models (~10 min, bonus include, $4 total rewards for completion!!)
Help Improve AI Models (~10 min, bonus include, $4 total rewards if passed the test!!)
Help Improve Machine Learning Models (~10 min, bonus include, $4 total rewards for completion!!)
Help Machine Learning Models (~10 min, bonus include, $4 total rewards for completion!!)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact