esclab Ratings
Workers feel this requester pays generously
Approves Quickly
No Rejections
No Blocks
esclab Wage History
Top Worker Reviews
SolidWork Careful Reader
Social decision-making study(~ 60 minutes) - $5.00
Underpaid
Poor
Approved
$8.12 / hour
00:36:58 / completion time
Pros
They paid. After a lot of unnecessary waste of worker time.Cons
11/28/22: I join the 5+ other Mturk workers today, who gave this particular HIT = LOW, or UNDERPAID ratings.I agree.
For $5. Only. NO bonus this HIT, even though their other long $5 HITs, paid a very GENEROUS bonus. Nope, not this HIT.
Neverending, hundreds of questions, dozens of pages. Long run-on sentences, that take time to read, think, and choose answers to.
Half way through, I had that feeling, "This is exploitation. This is clearly not balanced pay, for work trade" -
The HIT did not work for the first 20 minutes it was posted.
3+ workers on one Mturk forum, were talking to each other, getting feedback, was it loading/working -
Requester estimated work was 60 minutes. Requester chose a 60 minute timer. Thus, when the HIT finally functioned after 20 minutes of blank page? The HIT expired, as I was working it.
Prior, similarly titled HITs from this requester on Turkerview, mention $10-15 bonuses, with $5 base HIT pay. Many workers assumed THIS HIT would also have a big bonus, to compensate for the demanding, long, and tedious test. Same $5 base pay, as the prior HITs. NO bonus.
Nope. No such luck.
This is NOT worth it for $5 base pay. Double that for base pay, would be appropriate. Had I known? I would have returned this, and used my work time towards fairer paying work.
I am not working with this requester again, based on many poor choices made with this work.
Advice to Requester
- Reply to worker emails, when your work is malfunctioning. At least 3 workers state you didn't reply to any email this round.- We workers deserve fair minimum wage. This requester and HIT, chose to not provide that.
- Make the simple choice to double the HIT time in your HIT design = least double the actual HIT time estimate. That is what most seasoned requesters do. This offers a built in margin if your server errors, as it did today, without time theft from workers.
Maia Relaxed Pace
Social decision-making study(~ 60 minutes) - $5.00
Underpaid
Unrated
Approved
$8.26 / hour
00:36:19 / completion time
Pros
Underpaid but it's nice getting a chunk of five bucks in one go. The 60-minute estimation is confusing, and I'm not sure if it's actually a reference to the 60-minute timer. It took me a little over half an hour but I'm sure it could be done faster in the Likert scale section.Cons
Be aware this was getting a lot of returns, probably due to requester-side server issues. I had zero problems, but it's something to keep in mind.j0sh83 Average Pace
Social decision-making study(~ 60 minutes) - $5.00 +14.66 bonus Confirmed!
Generous
Unrated
Approved
$36.17 / hour
00:32:37 / completion time
Pros
Instructions, plus main task for bonus made up the first half. Lengthy survey for the second half. Demographics in the middle.Edit: bonus received same day.
Cons
Demographics in the middle gives false hope.Long and tedious. Very bubbly. Felt like it was not going to end.
No code.