TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

esclab

Is this your requester account?
University of Colorado Boulder
  • Overview
  • Reviews 135
  • HITs 14

esclab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

esclab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

SolidWork Careful Reader
Reviews: 28
Points: 129
Ratings: 15
Social decision-making study(~ 60 minutes) - $5.00

Underpaid

Poor

Approved

$8.12 / hour

00:36:58 / completion time

Pros

They paid. After a lot of unnecessary waste of worker time.

Cons

11/28/22: I join the 5+ other Mturk workers today, who gave this particular HIT = LOW, or UNDERPAID ratings.

I agree.

For $5. Only. NO bonus this HIT, even though their other long $5 HITs, paid a very GENEROUS bonus. Nope, not this HIT.

Neverending, hundreds of questions, dozens of pages. Long run-on sentences, that take time to read, think, and choose answers to.

Half way through, I had that feeling, "This is exploitation. This is clearly not balanced pay, for work trade" -

The HIT did not work for the first 20 minutes it was posted.

3+ workers on one Mturk forum, were talking to each other, getting feedback, was it loading/working -

Requester estimated work was 60 minutes. Requester chose a 60 minute timer. Thus, when the HIT finally functioned after 20 minutes of blank page? The HIT expired, as I was working it.

Prior, similarly titled HITs from this requester on Turkerview, mention $10-15 bonuses, with $5 base HIT pay. Many workers assumed THIS HIT would also have a big bonus, to compensate for the demanding, long, and tedious test. Same $5 base pay, as the prior HITs. NO bonus.

Nope. No such luck.

This is NOT worth it for $5 base pay. Double that for base pay, would be appropriate. Had I known? I would have returned this, and used my work time towards fairer paying work.

I am not working with this requester again, based on many poor choices made with this work.

Advice to Requester

- Reply to worker emails, when your work is malfunctioning. At least 3 workers state you didn't reply to any email this round.
- We workers deserve fair minimum wage. This requester and HIT, chose to not provide that.
- Make the simple choice to double the HIT time in your HIT design = least double the actual HIT time estimate. That is what most seasoned requesters do. This offers a built in margin if your server errors, as it did today, without time theft from workers.
Nov 28, 2022 | 7 workers found this helpful.

Maia Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 23,037
Points: 9,984
Ratings: 583
Social decision-making study(~ 60 minutes) - $5.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$8.26 / hour

00:36:19 / completion time

Pros

Underpaid but it's nice getting a chunk of five bucks in one go. The 60-minute estimation is confusing, and I'm not sure if it's actually a reference to the 60-minute timer. It took me a little over half an hour but I'm sure it could be done faster in the Likert scale section.

Cons

Be aware this was getting a lot of returns, probably due to requester-side server issues. I had zero problems, but it's something to keep in mind.
Nov 29, 2022 | 2 workers found this helpful.

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,419
Points: 12,340
Ratings: 1,213
Social decision-making study(~ 60 minutes) - $5.00 +14.66 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$36.17 / hour

00:32:37 / completion time

Pros

Instructions, plus main task for bonus made up the first half. Lengthy survey for the second half. Demographics in the middle.

Edit: bonus received same day.

Cons

Demographics in the middle gives false hope.

Long and tedious. Very bubbly. Felt like it was not going to end.

No code.
Oct 12, 2022 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see esclab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

esclab


AGXBKM2NGUHM4 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Conflict and Decision Making(~ 22 minutes)
Conflict and Decision Making(~ 30 minutes)
Short Survey on Modern Issue(~ 15 minutes)
Short Survey on Modern Issues(~ 15 minutes)
Social decision-making study(~ 60 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact