TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

John Campbell

Is this your requester account?
Arizona State University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 7
  • HITs

John Campbell Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

John Campbell Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,099
Points: 6,465
Ratings: 2,069
Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (National)(~ 40 minutes) - $2.00 +2.50 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$7.49 / hour

00:36:04 / completion time

Pros

This survey was hosted on asuclas.qualtrics.com with branding for the Arizona State University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLUS) - it provides an Informed Consent sheet stating the study is being run by Dr. Jessica M. Salerno and has been approved by the Arizona State University Chair of the Human Subjects Institutional Review Board.

The Requester name, however, is John Campbell - a name previously linked to "Empirical Jury" requester account that has run almost identical studies in the past.

I have never had a particularly negative experience with the previous account, and multiple interactions with their staff have been pleasant, but placing this under an academic institution is very strange and provides an inconsistent experience IMO. There are very different standards / expectations I have between an academic or business account when participating in online studies & this definitely is a good example of the clash between those as noted in "cons"

Cons

The consent sheet provides the following under "Risks"

"RISKS
As a result of reading about the legal case, you might experience negative mood or feelings. However, these feelings will be no different from what you might experience reading or watching the news. You will be asked to provide your opinions to a number of questions and complete tasks that you would experience if you were called for jury duty."

AFTER accepting this, on the very next page, you're presented with threats of legal liability in response to your participation in the survey.

Which leaves me super confused why an IRB is approving work that was previously run by what I always understood to be a private business and allowing legal threats to be left in the study without including them on the consent sheet.

Nonetheless, I completed the study which offers a bonus of $2.50 for completing memory checks which are fairly in-depth and also places the approval of your work under an undisclosed threshold. I felt it was incredibly underpaid for the gravity & importance placed on the work in the study and hope ASU reviews its policies on this research in the future.

I would, personally, not recommend completing studies for this researcher since the risks far outweight the benefits & wages associated with the work. I don't believe placing it under an academic umbrella excuses the incredibly low wages being paid to contract workers.

The questions required for the bonus are in-depth. The study presents information that, under normal jury duty, would span days/weeks of time to commit to memory and requires recall of them in the small span of 30-60 minutes. Failure to earn the bonus would leave this work paying $3.33/hour and I tend to complete work 20% faster than the average worker, I think the majority of individuals who participate in this research, even if they earn the bonus, will likely be completing it at below federal minimum wage.
Aug 21, 2019 | 18 workers found this helpful.

tricker Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 4,720
Points: 3,842
Ratings: 273
Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (AOR - NAT)(~ 40 minutes) - $2.00 +2.50 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$9.01 / hour

00:29:58 / completion time

Pros

Possible bonus, I think I got it but it wasn't disclosed, however I knew all the answers they say I needed to know to receive it. Will update if received and update pay rating.
Update: Got the full bonus.

Cons

Aug 21, 2019

SaltyParabola Average Pace
Reviews: 8,734
Points: 6,142
Ratings: 470
Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (National 2)(~ 40 minutes) - $2.00 +2.50 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$8.21 / hour

00:32:53 / completion time

Pros

Offers a bonus if you answer at least 50% of the memory check questions correctly.

Cons

Severely underpaid without bonus. Lots of reading.
Aug 22, 2019

Want to see John Campbell's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

John Campbell


AFOLU40A8Z0WP MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (AOR - NAT 2)(~ 40 minutes)
Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (AOR - NAT 3)(~ 40 minutes)
Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (AOR - NAT)(~ 40 minutes)
Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (AOR COL)(~ 40 minutes)
Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For - Be a Mock Juror and Earn Money (CF - Nat 3)(~ 40 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact