TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

KIM SUNG HO

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 36
  • HITs 31

KIM SUNG HO Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

KIM SUNG HO Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

headcage Average Pace
Reviews: 286
Points: 586
Ratings: 49
Create the Physical Commonsense Data - $0.00 +33.20 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$14.44 / hour

02:25:27 / completion time

Pros

Long timer so you don't have to do all the work at once, or you can go at whatever pace you want. You can also choose how much you want to do. The pay is okay for the work done. Other people can probably do it faster than me and get a better hourly. They explain the task well so it looks intimidating at first, but it's easy to understand.

Cons

I'm unsure about how much I was able to edit, so hopefully what I did was fine, as long as I kept the overall meaning the same. The task itself isn't hard, but sometimes they present you with tough options, and if you don't want to skip, it can take a while to figure out a way to word it. It was easy for me to get distracted, so if people have issues with concentration, this might take more effort.
Dec 3, 2021 | 7 workers found this helpful.

laby Average Pace
Reviews: 14,365
Points: 10,456
Ratings: 1,189
[Qualification Test] Physical Commonsense Data Generation (upto $36) - $0.01 +1.70 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$14.87 / hour

00:06:54 / completion time

Pros

Cons

The follow up hit is confusing. The data submits but the hit does not. Maybe it comes as a bonus on this hit? Which would mean an extra $7 bonus here.

Follow up bonus did come here but I apparently did very badly and only got .70 cent for the followup portion:(

You've received a bonus from KIM SUNG HO for work related to 36FQTHX30CLXUESBQK7L92FLGEA3B8.
The value of your bonus is: $1.70 USD

The Requester included this note:
This is the reward for Qualification and Data Creation task. You generated total 10 data, but there is only 1 data satisfied our criteria. Most of the reasons for rejected data are very large difference in length between the correct sentence and the incorrect sentence, and it was overcorrected, resulting in data that had no correlation at all. It was out of the way so we couldn not use it at all. For this reason, you got \(Qualification\) + /bin/sh.7\(Creation\) for reward. If you want to participate more in our same HIT, please send me an email. Thank you.
Dec 19, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

skittles Careful Reader
Reviews: 695
Points: 749
Ratings: 231
Create the Physical Commonsense Data

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

Cons

According to the instructions, there was supposed to be a bonus of $.70 per questions answered. I answered 10 which means that I should have received $ 7. When I emailed the requester, this is the response I got "Hello.
We confirmed 10 data you generated. But, there were only 7 datasets that met the criteria we strongly requested in instruction. Most of the data that did not pass had object(specific wording which appeared in only one side) bias that resulted in the big hint for the question. So it was out of the way so we couldn't use it at all.
So, according to the standards announced in the Payment section, $1 (qualification) + $4.9 (creation) was paid."
I'm quite sure that I followed the instructions carefully So the explanation is BS.
Dec 3, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see KIM SUNG HO's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

KIM SUNG HO


AEF9JC9JDTQOP MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


“Create_the_Physical_Commonsense_Data”
[Qualification task] Physical Commonsense Data Creation (upto $36)
[Qualification Test] Physical Commonsense Data Generation (upto $36)
Create the Physical Commonsense Data
Generate Physical Commonsense Dataset (Reward will be paid by bonus)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact