TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

NLPCL

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 50
  • HITs 23

NLPCL Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

NLPCL Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Reviews: 12,539
Points: 11,042
Ratings: 1,408
Argument Acceptability Annotation for News Editorial - $20.00

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$13.17 / hour

01:31:05 / completion time

Pros

Long timer so you can spread out the work and do it at your convenience (although the HIT asks that you submit as soon as possible.)

The instructions say that you CAN repeat your explanations so long as all conditions are met, so if you had a really one-sided article you could probably save time by copy/pasting and just adding in clarification. I wasn't that lucky.

Cons

Even though my HIT timer SAYS 91 minutes, it feels like a lot longer than that. My article had 58 sentences (with 5 annotations each) and I spread the work out over 24+ hours.

The interface took a while to figure out and was a little glitchy (windows constantly needed adjusted because they loaded half-off the page, the double click to open the pop-up needed a really precise timing to activate)

I've heard that other workers got shorter articles for the same pay, so that's lame.
Feb 10, 2019 | 4 workers found this helpful.

DareAngel3 Fast Reader
Reviews: 12,539
Points: 11,042
Ratings: 1,408
Annotating Local Acceptability in News Editorials (V2) - $5.00

Low

Unrated

Pending

$7.93 / hour

00:37:49 / completion time

Pros

I didn't have any glitches with the interface. You only have to rate each sentence on one attribute (rather than several in previous HITs.)

Cons

I forced myself through one of these to see how underpaid it was. I managed to find one with relatively short/interesting articles. The instructions are a little vague and will make a lot more sense if you've done previous HITs from the requester. Each article gets its own completion code, which I didn't realize at first, and didn't want to redo- so I sent a note to the requester. This particular hit had 180 sentences to rate.
Nov 4, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Annotating Local Acceptability in News Editorials (V2) - $5.00

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$9.78 / hour

00:30:41 / completion time

Pros

-Slow morning work
-Once you got going, it became pretty mindless which I appreciated considering the cons.

Cons

-Hourly is gonna vary wildly on this one based on the articles you are to annotate. Some had 77 sentences, another had only 20.
-Directions were plentiful, but vague I thought, so half of this time was spent literally trying to figure out if I was doing this right or not.
Nov 1, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see NLPCL's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

NLPCL


AE0U3WVIX2QC1 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Annotating Local Acceptability in News Editorial (V3)
Annotating Local Acceptability in News Editorials (V2)
Annotating More Convincing One between Two Texts
Annotating Sentence Credibility after Augmentation
Annotating Tension in Ted Talks

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact