TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Scalable

Is this your requester account?
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Overview
  • Reviews 178
  • HITs

Scalable Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Scalable Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

AfterDarkMark Average Pace
Reviews: 1,227
Points: 4,921
Ratings: 483
Group experiment starting 28th FEB @1.30 PM ET - Forecast the weather with others. - $0.10 +16.05 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$13.84 / hour

01:10:00 / completion time

Pros

So, the bonus did justify doing this. See cons for more info.

Cons

Based on other reviews, it looks like some workers were only getting 10$ as a max bonus. And that was how it was worded in my instructions, I am pretty sure... I didn't check reviews before doing this, and was pretty annoyed at the length during it cause I thought 1 hour would be a high estimate (it wasn't, obviously).

I emailed the requester before getting my bonus and she said it is a 10$ or 9.90 show up bonus + performance compensation (which I am guessing can range from 0-10$, though it would probably be hard to get less than 3.50 on that side of things, even just randomly clicking).

So, as long as everyone is compensated the same way, 10$ + additional bonus, then this is a fair task.

If you did this in the past, I might message the requester, and ask what happened to the rest of your bonus or ask for a bigger bonus because obviously had it just been a 6$ bonus or whatnot for 1.16 hours, that would have sucked.

Advice to Requester

Clarify your instructions if it truly is 10$ + performance bonus too. Maybe figure out if you were compensating past workers incorrectly.
Feb 28, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Calexit Average Pace
Reviews: 2,419
Points: 3,732
Ratings: 365
Forecast the weather with others. - $0.01 +6.99 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Excellent

Approved

$6.31 / hour

01:06:33 / completion time

Pros

UPDATE: Underpaid, I emailed requester and was given a $6.99 bonus for 66 minutes of wasted time. Communication is excellent, but I am not satisfied because the maximum bonus was $10 and that would still only be fair pay. Adding requester to my personal blocklist.

Cons

DON'T DO IT. After spending 66 minutes and seeing the light at the end of the tunnel (not to mention losing out on much better hits) it froze. I finally ended up submitting with my worker id. Even if I get paid the max bonus it's only $10. Not worth it. Extremely boring.
Jan 28, 2019 | 7 workers found this helpful.

MechaTurk Average Pace
Reviews: 7,981
Points: 7,797
Ratings: 418
$20 Limited availability! Group experiment starting 1st MAR 5PM Eastern Time - Forecast the politics of another planet! - $0.10 +40.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Excellent

Approved

$35.04 / hour

01:08:40 / completion time

Pros

Edit: I've now been able to participate twice. My 1st round ran smoothly, ended 41 min shy of the estimated 60 minutes and payed out 10 cents more than the advertised bonus. Round 2 promises the same bonus and set the round at 70 minutes. It may have gone the distance, but glitched out 120 some rounds (~50 minutes) in. I messaged the req and they responded promptly (as others have reported) to submit with worker ID and said enough data had been collected that bonuses could be calculated.
Edit: Round 2 base and $20 bonus paid in a couple of days.

Cons

Bonus is not disclosed and pay could be terrible depending on what the payout happens to be.
Edit: Round 2 was laggy and a bit frustrating.
Edit: Given qual so I can't play no more :(
Mar 1, 2019

Want to see Scalable's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Scalable


ADB62G7WJI3DU MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Information and preferences study
(GAME AT 5PM EST) Forecast geo-political events using news tweets.
(PLAY IMMEDIATELY) Forecast geo-political events using news tweets.
[Play immediately] Multiplayer study- Earn 50 cents bonus up to $2
$20 Limited availability! Experiment starting 2nd APR 3PM Eastern Time - Forecast the politics of another planet!

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact