TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

SAI Team

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 48
  • HITs 38

SAI Team Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

SAI Team Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

jwturkeyturk Average Pace
Reviews: 3,811
Points: 2,408
Ratings: 183
Academic Study of Psychological Foundations of Text, Memory (multi-phase, $0.50 + potential $9.25)(~ 75 minutes) - $0.50 +9.25 bonus

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$14.33 / hour

00:40:50 / completion time

Pros

No pros.... only irritation

EDIT: They ended up giving me the 9.25 in bonus which was the "potential" amount. it comes out to 14.33/hr for the work I did which is OK... I probably would never do it again still but it ended up being OK in the end.

Cons

Ok, what was this?? the amount of work they expect you to do with this is outrageous.

1. They claim there is some bonus, but no where in the survey does it ever tell you what type of bonus you are going to get, not even at the end of it, no mention at all at the end.

2 . They have multiple threats of kicking you out inside the survey itself and lots of browser popups threatening you to either "go faster!" or "go slower!" which i found extremely aggravating. At one point I was reading an excerpt at the halfway point, and a popup comes up highlighting the entire page "YOU DIDN't COMPLETE THIS YET!!" Like YEAH IM WORKING ON IT RIGHT NOW!! LOL

3. JUST WOW THE READING YOU HAVE TO DO. They make you read five 800 word stories and ask you to remember specific sentences inside of them AND THEN read the comments on them. all the while you have no idea how much your bonus is actually going to be, like was it worth it? IDK PROBABLY NOT??

TLDR: I don't recommend this.
Jun 15, 2022

i_am_sam Proficient Worker
Reviews: 2,592
Points: 2,140
Ratings: 67
Academic Study on Characteristics of a Good Teammate - 2 phases within Assignment, $1 + potential $5(~ 45 minutes) - $1.00 +5.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$25.35 / hour

00:14:12 / completion time

Pros

Paid screener and then real focus. It was rather quicker than the requester set aside for time, so assuming I get the full bonus then the pay is great!

Cons

A few pages were bubble-hell; but certainly not the worst I've encountered
Nov 30, 2020

Madeline Dewar Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 1,003
Points: 1,192
Ratings: 270
Academic Study on Characteristics of a Good Teammate - 2 phases within Assignment, $1 + potential $5(~ 45 minutes) - $1.00 +5.00 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Unrated

Approved

$11.87 / hour

00:30:20 / completion time

Pros

If you take phase one and qualify for phase two, they'll bonus you $5. Otherwise, the first part is a quick, compensated screener survey.
The format is good - no pages of endless questions.

Cons

Several open-ended questions.
Oct 19, 2020

Want to see SAI Team's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

SAI Team


AD1FJ5BDJ24AP MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Academic Study of Psychological Foundations of Text and Memory (multiple phases, $0.50 base + potential $9.25)(~ 90 minutes)
Academic Study of Psychological Foundations of Text, Memory (multi-phase, $0.50 + potential $9.25)(~ 75 minutes)
Academic Study of Psychological Foundations of Text, Memory (multi-phase, $0.50 + potential $9.25)(~ 90 minutes)
Academic Study of the Psychological Foundations of Text and Memory(~ 90 minutes)
Academic Study on Characteristics of a Good Teammate - 2 phases within Assignment, $1 + potential $5(~ 45 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact