TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Researchers from Barcelona

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 106
  • HITs 21

Researchers from Barcelona Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Researchers from Barcelona Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

BluAngel Average Pace
Reviews: 2,384
Points: 1,251
Ratings: 139
Evaluate names for objects in images (~3.5min; $0.15 bonus possible) - $0.50 +0.15 bonus

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$9.92 / hour

00:03:56 / completion time

Pros

It seems like a good filler on slow days.
Instructions are always present when you need to review them.
Update-They gave a .15 cent bonus for doing all the control items perfectly.
They are open to feedback.

Cons

Hourly is a bit low or if it was a bit shorter would be appreciated.
Time-consuming to read all directions.
Friendly warning sends you back to recheck your work and I was unable to get the message to clear so not sure if I did something incorrectly or not.

Advice to Requester

Hourly is a bit low or if it was a bit shorter would be appreciated.
Time-consuming to read all directions.
Friendly warning sends you back to recheck your work and I was unable to get the message to clear so not sure if I did something incorrectly or not.
Seems like a good filler on slow days.
Nov 13, 2019

Wander Fast Reader
Reviews: 68
Points: 290
Ratings: 34
Evaluate names for objects in images (~3.5min; $0.15 bonus possible) - $0.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.20 / hour

00:13:40 / completion time

Pros

I only did one hit, so my time includes instruction-reading.

Cons

I went through the hit and got a warning message. I went back, revised some responses, and still had the warning message. By that point, I'd spent over ten minutes on the hit so I submitted it anyway. I really wanted to like this batch, it seems like the sort of thing I'd be good at, but I guess not.

Advice to Requester

I'd recommend replacing the test with something that really tests workers' understanding of what you're looking for. I read the instructions thoroughly and worked in a distraction-free environment and I still couldn't pass the quality control checks.
Nov 12, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Gary Hess Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 6,235
Points: 2,467
Ratings: 97
Object naming in natural scenes - $4.50

Unrated

Unacceptable

Approved

$17.72 / hour

00:15:14 / completion time

Pros

After emailing the requester she overturned my rejection. I am not sure what the problem was, but I am very satisfied with the result.

Cons

Was rejected "invalid verification code". I completed the survey and their system provided a code. I emailed them to explain how this can happen and they haven't responded.

Advice to Requester

Respond to those who take the time to do your surveys.
Jan 21, 2022

Want to see Researchers from Barcelona's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Researchers from Barcelona


A91P6MTYV299S MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


[ID=Apricot] Which pair of categories are the most related? (~8 mins).
[ID=Bygone] Which pair of categories are the most related? (~10 mins).
[ID=Bygone] Which pair of categories are the most related? (~8 mins).
[ID=Cheetah] Which pair of categories are the most related? (~8 mins).
[ID=Dancing] Which pair of categories are the most related? (~8 mins).

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact