TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Webis

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 109
  • HITs 112

Webis Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Webis Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

TheWerkz Average Pace
Reviews: 210
Points: 1,130
Ratings: 111
Select plausible justifications for arguments - $1.80 +4.00 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Unrated

Approved

$24.34 / hour

00:14:18 / completion time

Pros

There's 5 separate statements to rate by selecting up to 5 different "plausible" answers for each one out of 50 or so possible reasons that make the statement plausible.

Good examplew were given as well as why other possible answers weren't a got selection.

There's built-in keyboard shortcuts to navigate the answers and you have to select either Yes or No for every one of them.

Then, there's also up to 2 (optional) write-in answers allowed for each statement if you think your answer might be even better or more appropriate to make the statement more plausible.

There's a second text box in case there's something about the answers that don't align with the statement, or for suggestions about the task.

I'm fairly certain this is training an AI algorithm since it seems like other AI batches I've done in the past.

The HIT is also for a qual for much more upcoming work!

I just received a $4.00 bonus!
There wasn't any mention of a bonus anywhere in the HIT.

And then they followed-up the bonus with an email asking if I wanted to do more of their HITs!

Tough decision...

Cons

None for me!

Advice to Requester

Great job with the examples, not too long or unnessarily complicated.
Sep 14, 2021

Tarl Fast Reader
Reviews: 290
Points: 355
Ratings: 88
Extract sentences from articles to spoil clickbait headlines - $0.10

Underpaid

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$3.46 / hour

00:01:44 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Glad I only did 5.

Cons

-Rejection
"Unfortunately, we can not accept your submitted sentence. After reviewing your answer we found that the submitted sentence does not spoil the given headline. We think that there are more suitable spoiler options available."

Soooooo subjective. Ok I'll just post a review telling everybody how shady you are, block you, and never worry about you again.
Mar 12, 2019 | 12 workers found this helpful.

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,419
Points: 12,340
Ratings: 1,213
Ask questions to objects in a virtual museum - $3.00

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$12.16 / hour

00:14:48 / completion time

Pros

Interesting HIT. Sort of like a self guided tour. You move through a room with 360 degree viewing capabilities and ask at least two questions for each part of the tour. Total of 6 audio's so 12 questions minimum. IF you ask a third question per audio, they will bonus you 10 cents.

Cons

88% approval rating with several rejections noted on TV, though nothing from 2021.

Writing x12+.
Sep 7, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Webis's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Webis


A7W013PM199BS MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Annotate whether segments of a news article would be included in a summary of the article
Answer a 15 min survey on a fictional voice-based argument search system
Argumentative Text Classification
Ask questions on short informative audio snippets
Ask questions to objects in a virtual museum

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact