TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Christopher Klotz

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 82
  • HITs 50

Christopher Klotz Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Christopher Klotz Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

bugeekman Proficient Worker
Reviews: 28,195
Points: 17,533
Ratings: 1,047
Which book cover is more appealing? - $0.20

Low

Unrated

Pending

$9.47 / hour

00:01:16 / completion time

Pros

Cons

did this HIT twice over due to broken submission. pick a choice explain your answer prompt

failed recaptcha or something at the end and did twice to make sure. seems like a waste of time and rejection may be incoming
Nov 3, 2022 | 2 workers found this helpful.

delaneyyyw Proficient Worker
Reviews: 252
Points: 340
Ratings: 19
Which opening app screen is more appealing for a dating app? - $0.20

Fair

Unrated

Pending

$7.13 / hour

00:01:41 / completion time

Pros

It was really, really easy. Most would probably write less than I did too, making it about a 60-90sec HIT.

Cons

Very, very small bit of writing.
Aug 12, 2020

lovemydogs Average Pace
Reviews: 2,734
Points: 2,005
Ratings: 147
Which book cover is more appealing? - $0.20

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected (All)

$7.42 / hour

00:01:37 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

REJECTED.....tried it twice, claims the recaptha was missed, however it is not there. Will see if it gets rejected due to requester error
Nov 3, 2022

Want to see Christopher Klotz's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Christopher Klotz


A68AJHXRYO33L MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Are you in favour of impeaching Trump?
For our main photo, is a front view or side view of the goggle better?
How do you like this name "InspireMe.Fund" for a crowd funding platform?
This is our test project summary video for our ski racing club. What do you think?
We are a commercial law firm - rank the logos you think work best.

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact