TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

CU Learning Lab

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 536
  • HITs 648

CU Learning Lab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

CU Learning Lab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

sarin Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 10,091
Points: 10,085
Ratings: 1,705
Decisions about paintings(~ 40 minutes) - $3.50 +2.38 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$12.05 / hour

00:29:16 / completion time

Pros

Columbia University

Luck-based bonus

Choose paintings that give the most profit

Cons

This is basically a 30 minute long Inquisit set of tasks that goes on FOREVER.

You have to do 2 trials of binary painting choices that are timed, go on forever, and include random writing to explain some of your choices.
You then have to look at the same paintings you chose and go through a pointless timed task where you look at their profits.
You go through another 4 trials of timed binary painting choices that go on even longer, then you have to estimate the profit of each single painting that was shown with a slider and bubble choice per painting, then you have to remember what painting pairs were shown together, all with timers.
After that, you have to write about your strategies in this study, answer survey questions, then you have to wait for your results to submit. If you somehow don't submit your results, you'll get rejected.

Apart from that above statement, the requester threatens to reject for a lot of reasons, including waiting too long, exiting fullscreen, and answering randomly, so there is pretty much nothing good about this study at all.

This is underpaid garbage that you should avoid.
Aug 28, 2019 | 10 workers found this helpful.

purplepotato Fast Reader
Reviews: 6,712
Points: 7,214
Ratings: 975
Card color discovery game(~ 60 minutes) - $3.60 +5.40 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Unrated

Approved

$12.13 / hour

00:44:31 / completion time

Pros

You can take breaks in between the rounds, which does make it less tedious.  Bonus potential is decent-ish, up to $4.50 per session I think, and $2 for completing all four (I included an extra 50 cents to account for that final bonus).  I'm assuming the following days will be quite a bit quicker without so many instructions and practice rounds to get through.

Edit: Bonus paid same day and was $1.40 higher than expected, raising the pay from fair to good

Cons

Really long and repetitive.  Six rounds of full-screen learning rounds and memory tests that switch between keyboard and mouse for each part.  Some memory checks have to be repeated if you make a mistake  This is probably about how long it's going to take most folks, maybe a little bit longer if you make mistakes on the memory tests.
Sep 27, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

dan Average Pace
Reviews: 8,517
Points: 8,988
Ratings: 1,987
What snack do you prefer? - $5.50

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$9.46 / hour

00:34:53 / completion time

Pros

It's not inquisit.

Cons

Inquisit style task, but not inquisit. Incredibly BAD. Multiple tasks. Once you're done with a task, you breathe a sigh of relief, but nope - another task shortly follows. So you get through a bunch of tasks - Then you get to the REALLY LONG TEDIOUS TASK, and when you're finally done - you think, "HALLELUJAH" - however, you're not done - it's just a take a break message. So you go back to this INCrEDIBLY LONG TEDIOUS TASK, and then you finally finish and you think "thank god." - but nope, ANOTHER FRIGGIN TASK!!!
Jul 31, 2018 | 6 workers found this helpful.

Want to see CU Learning Lab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

CU Learning Lab


A4Q6ZYVYR6YUA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Art and decision making(~ 45 minutes)
Art and decisions. (~ 30 minutes)
Art and decisions. (~ 35 minutes)
Art and decisions. (~ 45 minutes)
Art and decisions. (~ 50 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact