TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Hemphill Research

Is this your requester account?
University of Michigan
  • Overview
  • Reviews 62
  • HITs 5

Hemphill Research Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Hemphill Research Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Alexandra in VT Average Pace
Reviews: 8,350
Points: 5,826
Ratings: 671
Insult classification for comments - $0.30

Good

Unrated

Approved

$12.27 / hour

00:01:28 / completion time

Pros

fairly good pay and you can catch a bunch at once
nice long timers
I've been lucky to not be rejected in the past by this requester, so I'm going to play my hand
if they do reject you it's only for a particular HIT, not the whole lot you've done (assuming they continue on the way they have approved/rejected)

Cons

have been known to reject based on failed validation - especially since if your answers don't match with 75% of other responses - so it's not entirely "unfair", it just depends in part on how you interpret the tweets and also how much the other turkers are paying attention to things like sarcasm et c.
Jul 17, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

tricker Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 4,720
Points: 3,842
Ratings: 273
Insult classification for comments - 40 (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) - $0.30

Generous

Excellent

Rejected

$16.88 / hour

00:01:04 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

While this one was rejected all of my others were approved (with one more pending) so I emailed the requester who is reviewing the entire body of work I submitted to see if my overall rate is acceptable enough to approve the hit where I missed the validation question(s). The one pending is probably where I missed the same statements again as I saw a few repeated and if I rated them the "wrong" way the first time I'm sure I rated them the "wrong" way again. Communication is excellent, though, even if the rejection stands.

Cons

Apr 17, 2019
Hemphill Research (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Too many validation questions were not answered correctly


Lumius Proficient Worker
Reviews: 1,379
Points: 3,289
Ratings: 336
Take a survey about personal data and how it gets used - $3.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$25.47 / hour

00:07:04 / completion time

Pros

They don't seem to have any rejections on their surveys, mostly from 2019 tweet labeling.
The sections scroll automatically.

Cons

TV Rejections on other HITS.
Repetitive.
Scrolling windows and bubbles.
Long demographics, then a couple more sections after you think it should be the end.
Feels longer than it is.
Nov 5, 2021

Want to see Hemphill Research's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Hemphill Research


A4NX3CMST33I8 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Insult classification for comments
Insult classification for comments - 113 (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Insult classification for comments - 127 (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Insult classification for comments - 168 (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Insult classification for comments - 176 (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact