TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Finance Paderborn

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 66
  • HITs 36

Finance Paderborn Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Finance Paderborn Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DarrenMT Fast Reader
Reviews: 98
Points: 644
Ratings: 40
Follow-up study ONLY FOR INVITED participants. 5:00 pm EST(~ 15 minutes) - $2.00 +13.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Excellent

Approved

$21.81 / hour

00:41:16 / completion time

Pros

Possible bonus (it said I received $13.00 as bonus, but I will update when they actually pay the bonus.)

Update: They paid the bonus! It was in two payments for some reason (one was for $5.00 and the next was for $8.00) but they paid it. So, I'm updating the overall pay rating grade on this to Generous.

The Requester's finance team / payment department person, Seb, was also helpful in responding to multiple emails about the payment, so I'm upgrading the Communication score on this review too.

Cons

The study they were doing had a technical problem wherein the server they were using crashed, but I was able to complete the study after they'd rebooted the server. The task assigned me a bonus of $13.00 after I'd completed it for a total payment of $15.00 counting the participation amount of $2.00 for the HIT.

I emailed the Requester with a screenshot of the study results window showing clearly that it awarded me a $13.00 bonus, and they promised payment of the entire bonus...though they noted it "might be another 24 hours as we are in a different time zone."

So, I put in in a placeholder 1-cent bonus and planned to update as to whether or not they actually came through on their promise to pay the bonus of $13.00.

Update: They paid it this morning the 23rd! I updated the review accordingly.
Dec 22, 2021

YarnAndCats Fast Reader
Reviews: 4,875
Points: 3,532
Ratings: 387
Follow-up study ONLY FOR INVITED participants. 5:00 pm EST(~ 15 minutes) - $2.00 +5.00 bonus

Underpaid

Unacceptable

Pending

$10.75 / hour

00:39:04 / completion time

Pros

I got lucky and got a big bonus (very RNG)

Cons

-My bonus was supposed to be $17.50. Their server crashed and they lost the data so they just gave a $5 bonus to everyone which made this HIT very underpaid and unfair. I have contacted the requester and will update if they give me the bonus I actually earned.

112 rounds and each round took forever to load. This could have been done much quicker if the system moved along at the pace it should have
Dec 21, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

gym_rat New Reviewer
Reviews: 6
Points: 66
Ratings: 13
Follow-up study for invited participants(~ 15 minutes) - $1.00 +10.00 bonus

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$49.56 / hour

00:13:19 / completion time

Pros

Great bonus potential, could be well above what I earned because I chose not to gamble. Easy to do. Could potentially be done faster; I had wait a few minutes for others to finish.

Cons

Bonus has an element of chance to it. You need to complete a 5 cent screener study posted earlier this morning in order to get an invite.
Dec 20, 2021

Want to see Finance Paderborn's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Finance Paderborn


A3VKSV51GOF69Q MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Earn an average of $7 and up to $20 in our follow-up study(~ 1 minutes)
Earn an average of $8 in our follow-up study(~ 1 minutes)
Follow-up study for invited participants today 12:30 pm(~ 15 minutes)
Follow-up study for INVITED participants today, 15th February 2022, 12:30 pm EST(~ 15 minutes)
Follow-up study for INVITED participants today, 15th February 2022, 2:00 pm EST(~ 15 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact