TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Dept of Accounting

Is this your requester account?
Texas A&M University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 58
  • HITs 12

Dept of Accounting Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Dept of Accounting Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Morgainne Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,070
Points: 11,185
Ratings: 698
***Payment up to $7.50 for approx. 35 mins*** (Participate in a simple experiment.) - $0.00 +5.40 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$21.79 / hour

00:14:52 / completion time

Pros

Different and interesting. Worth a shot if you want a break from bubbles and trolley questions.

Cons

After a while, the number of trials got a bit tedious. The instructions were very long winded and confusing for me. Granted, playing Dragon Age all night did not help but was not gonna pass this one up. I wish the instructions were more simplified. I figured it out eventually though. Overall, a good hit but when it comes to numerical stuff like what was included here I get easily confused. Perhaps more coffee could have helped. I was hoping for a better bonus but hey, good enough.
Jun 16, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

rippy Proficient Worker
Reviews: 216
Points: 470
Ratings: 74
***Payment up to $9.00 for approx. 45 mins*** (Participate in a simple experiment.) - $0.00 +16.79 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$49.18 / hour

00:20:29 / completion time

Pros

Pretty fast once you take note of the instructions. I got $5 extra for pointing out an error in their reference materials. Fairly good chance of getting a relatively high bonus with judiciousness.

I actually ended up getting the wrong bonus amount which we cleared up via emails. This requester bonused me extra for the trouble. Nice guy.

Cons

Zero base pay. It's basically based on chance/playing the odds as to whether you'll get a good hourly.
Apr 30, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Lizj87 Average Pace
Reviews: 740
Points: 1,550
Ratings: 167
***Payment of $3.00 for approx. 30 mins*** (Participants will read and take a survey about financial analyst reports.) - $3.00

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$8.90 / hour

00:20:13 / completion time

Pros

It said you didn't need to have understanding of financial statements, just high school level English. That was accurate, the survey used financial documents but was just about the language not the numbers. That was refreshing.

Cons

Three sets of comprehension question at the beginning that said you needed to get the questions right to be paid - but then didn't actually tell me outright whether I got them right or not, just moved on with the survey.
Nov 14, 2019

Want to see Dept of Accounting's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Dept of Accounting


A3UXZY1QW39D6J MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


(Get Paid up to $3 for 20 minutes!!) Participate in a simple experiment.
***Get Paid up to $8.25 for 1 hour!*** (Participate in a simple experiment.)
***Payment of $1.50 for approx. 15 mins*** Investor Decision Making
***Payment of $3.00 for approx. 30 mins*** (Participants will read and take a survey about financial analyst reports.)
***Payment of $3.50 for approx. 30 mins*** (Participants will read and take a survey about financial analyst reports.)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact