TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Blazej Mrozinski

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 14
  • HITs 6

Blazej Mrozinski Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Blazej Mrozinski Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Yoyo Average Pace
Reviews: 68
Points: 1,899
Ratings: 187
Mental visualization abilities - $1.25

Good

Acceptable

Rejected

$9.32 / hour

00:08:03 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Quick to reject, so I didn't have to wait around to find out.

Edit: Was able to contact them and they said they mixed up my ID with another person's. They paid the work as a bonus rather than undoing the rejection, however, which is not exactly what I'd like, but better than nothing.

Cons

You have to write AT LEAST 800 words (but they prefer it to be closer to 1600) detailing a time you were very angry.

Your essay is then "reviewed" by another Worker who will either say you are awful, one of the worst people they've seen, or they'll praise you for what you wrote. You also have to read what "they" wrote, and review them, and give them a rating.

Of course the task is designed to see if making you discuss something painful or angering and then being told you're awful is going to want to make you retaliate against the other "person". Okay.

The trouble is that after writing a almost 1400 words essay about a very personal story in which a friend ghosted me and how angering and hurtful it was (in which II tried to reach out to them a second time a few years later after find them again and they disappeared a second time to avoid me) they went ahead and rejected me anyway.

They said that either I had already taken the study (not true, I've never worked for this Requestor before) or my responses were "random" or "not logical".

Which, to be honest, I find a very disgusting thing to say to someone who is recalling a very personal, and hurtful experience in their life. Maybe I should have made something up, "Oh man, I sure was mad when I dropped my coffee the other day! Grrr!", but I try to normally be honest and provide Requestors with the best data I can. My mistake.

Advice to Requester

Even if you don't like or understand what a person went through, that's no reason for you to reject them, for what is clearly a honest effort. I wrote almost all 1600 characters for you, and it still wasn't good enough. I can't imagine how many others who couldn't muster that much effort will be rejected, which isn't fair to them either.

When you do undo rejections, it would be better to simply reverse them, rather than awarding the amount as a bonus instead.
Jan 25, 2022

TomB Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 166
Points: 350
Ratings: 39
Mental visualization abilities - $1.25

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$7.22 / hour

00:10:23 / completion time

Pros

I got to write an essay about how researchers who pay slave wages are truly evil people.

Cons

Wants an 800-1600 character count essay. I am truly fed up with researchers who think they can post HIT asking for original content and not pay for it. I will probably be rejected for the essay I wrote but it was worth telling this jerk that he was underpaying his workers. Stay away from his HITs unless you like working for pennies. Additionally, he said there was a possibility for a bonus that was never a real possibility. I would think that would be sort of an ethics issue but what do I know.

Advice to Requester

As a new requester, having an approve rating of 89% is not a great thing. I wish I had seen that before I took your survey.
Jan 21, 2022

SaltyParabola Average Pace
Reviews: 8,734
Points: 6,142
Ratings: 470
Mental visualization abilities - $1.25

Low

Unrated

Approved

$6.66 / hour

00:11:16 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Writing task (800-1600 characters). Promises a bonus, then reveals it won't be paid out -- I probably shouldn't reveal that here, but if I were using TV to decide whether to work for this requester, I'd want to know.
Jan 20, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Blazej Mrozinski's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Blazej Mrozinski


A3UQ8ROG2U3HOZ MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Mental visualization abilities
Personality and Emotions

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact