TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

CHB

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 19
  • HITs 19

CHB Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

CHB Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

savetheunlikely Fast Reader
Reviews: 9,024
Points: 5,270
Ratings: 369
Categorizing Object Images v1 - $5.20

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$6.47 / hour

00:48:12 / completion time

Pros

Getting to write this whopper of a review. I'm a different person now than I was two hours ago.

Cons

WHAT A HEAPING PILE OF TRASH OMG. You know how some HITs, the times are massively overestimated, you shave off a few minutes, and it's sort of worthwhile? Hard nope - this one ended up taking longer, times provided by requester are the fasted completion. No bonus or additional pay no matter how well you perform, just the pleasure of completing this absolute piece of garbage HIT. Requires constant attention of focus while simultaneuously lulling you to sleep and expecting you to remember anything from your dream state. All for less than minimum wage that I'll STILL have to be taxes on. This is EVERYTHING that's wrong with mTurk all bundled into one flaming hunk of junk. Too far in to turn back, so you sink more time into this meaningless underpaid void.
Feb 4, 2020 | 15 workers found this helpful.

Terrasita Average Pace
Reviews: 418
Points: 411
Ratings: 28
Learning and Attention Full 4 - $7.50

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$3.75 / hour

02:00:00 / completion time

Pros

It eventually ended.

Cons

DO NOT DO BOTHER WITH THIS HIT. To see why, see the email I sent the requester:
I just have to tell you how tortuous this HIT was. It was the worst HIT I have ever done on mturk and I have finished about 12,000. It took me about 2 hours to finish with only 2 5 minute breaks, which means it is severely underpaid. For comparison, I have recently completed a $24 HIT in about a half hour. Not only was it time consuming and required my constant attention, it was DIFFICULT. I had to go through a practice round SEVEN TIMES because I didn't get 90% correct. It wasn't because I wasn't paying attention, but because it was HARD. Add to that the constant threat of rejection if you do poorly during the actual trial run (Which I did on the last task--I scored average of 73ish% and needed 80%).
Dec 21, 2017 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Random Jobber Fast Reader
Reviews: 11,834
Points: 14,986
Ratings: 1,867
Categorizing Pictures v10 - $3.25

Low

Poor

Approved

$7.80 / hour

00:25:00 / completion time

Pros

Can take breaks between rounds, but no longer than 4 minutes. Approved instantly despite the issues.

Cons

4 ~5 minute rounds of pressing z,x,n,m very quickly in response to images, no progress bar during the round, will be rejected if your accuracy is lower than 70% (YMMV, I didn't find it that hard). Post-task questionnaire was broken and could not be completed, requester replied in 3 minutes saying they would fix it, but they didn't so I sent another email saying I had 17 minutes left, no response with 3 minutes left so I entered my worker ID as the post-task questionnaire code and then submitted with the code given to me afterwards.
Jan 2, 2019 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Want to see CHB's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

CHB


A3TZCXP3VNWVSM MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Categorizing Object Images Part 1
Categorizing Object Images Part 2
Categorizing Object Images v1
Categorizing Object Images vImm
Categorizing Pictures v10

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact