TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Grigorios Lamprinakos

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 13
  • HITs 11

Grigorios Lamprinakos Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Grigorios Lamprinakos Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Morgainne Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,070
Points: 11,185
Ratings: 698
Answer a survey about your opinions about consumption of beverages. - $2.20

Good

Excellent

Approved

$22.00 / hour

00:06:00 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Update: The requester got back to me and was very polite and apologetic. It seems the rejection was an error and was reversed in a few hours. While frustrating, I can understand how things like this can happen, especially when a requester is new. I am just grateful and happy that was resolved on a positive note.

Not sure what this rejection means. Will be messaging the requester. If this has to do with the survey asking for my full name well, that's a TOS violation. Hoping to hear back. Damn, and I just realized having to message this dude means he will probably see my name anyway. Derp!

This was a mess. The format was awkward as hell. Several agree/disagree scales had to be scrolled over to answer. Starts off with list writing and then after that, you have to write a 'recall' experience in detail. Most of the bubble questions were basically the same thing asked five hundred different ways. Not sure what half of these questions had to do with the survey topic.
Dec 18, 2020
Grigorios Lamprinakos (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Info requested were not filled in properly

This rejection was overturned!


Pamela Average Pace
Reviews: 15
Points: 89
Ratings: 14
Answer a survey about your opinions about consumption of beverages. - $2.20

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$17.48 / hour

00:07:33 / completion time

Pros

Cons

UPDATE: The requester responded to my message quickly and was very polite and apologized for the rejection stating that it was accidental. It has been reversed.
Rejected with the message "Info requested were not filled in properly". I emailed the requester asking for more clarity because I'm not sure what that means. Waiting to hear back, will update.
Dec 21, 2020
Grigorios Lamprinakos (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Info requested were not filled in properly

This rejection was overturned!


Alexandra in VT Average Pace
Reviews: 8,350
Points: 5,826
Ratings: 671
Answer a survey about your opinions about consumption of beverages. - $2.20

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$25.47 / hour

00:05:11 / completion time

Pros

Cons

20 minute timer
Dec 18, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Grigorios Lamprinakos's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Grigorios Lamprinakos


A3TD4XG870WZQX MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Academic research study (10 mins; $1.40; no writing exercise)
Answer a survey about a hypothetical scenario of a provided service
Answer a survey about day to day experiences regarding luck and maths skills
Answer a survey about your opinions about consumption of beverages.
Answer a survey about your opinions regarding a backpack

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact