TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Org Researcher25

Is this your requester account?
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 44
  • HITs 103

Org Researcher25 Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Org Researcher25 Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DarrenMT Fast Reader
Reviews: 98
Points: 644
Ratings: 40
3-5 minute survey about your work experiences. - $0.25

Low

Excellent

Approved

$5.14 / hour

00:02:55 / completion time

Pros

Mostly your standard fill-in-bubbles type of HIT. Easy to do; I would have finished quicker if I hadn't paused for longer than I should to look and re-look over what appeared to be a typo in an attention check and wonder if that would cause me to be disqualified since there was no right way to answer. So, since I should have emailed the Requester sooner instead of just staring at the typo, I bumped up the pay rate a bit.

However, speaking of that typo, I emailed the Requester and he got back to me within 15 minutes, thanked me profusely for reporting it, and assured me there would be no problems with getting paid. He also fixed the typo and re-published the corrected HIT so nobody else runs into it. I'm rating the Communication as "Excellent." If there was an "Exemplary" I would use that, because he did everything a Requester SHOULD do when emailed: 1) Answer promptly, 2) Admit when a typo or error is their fault and not the worker's, and 3) Resolve the issue.

Cons

There was a typo in an AC question, but given that the Requester responded extremely quickly to an email about it and resolved the issue, I'm not bothered about that.

Advice to Requester

Please keep up the excellent communication.
Jul 25, 2021

Pronewbi3 Proficient Worker
Reviews: 10,700
Points: 7,439
Ratings: 866
10-15 minute survey about your work experiences. - $0.30

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$8.06 / hour

00:02:14 / completion time

Pros

Cons

-Way too many bubbles for the pay.
Sep 9, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Calyrica Proficient Worker
Reviews: 4,389
Points: 4,131
Ratings: 449
8-12 minute survey about your work experiences. - $0.75

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$14.29 / hour

00:03:09 / completion time
Feb 25, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Org Researcher25's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Org Researcher25


A3T6G7ZMRPA5I0 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


1-2 minute survey about your work experiences.
1-3 minute survey about your work experiences
1-3 minute survey about your work experiences.
10-15 minute survey about your work experiences.
2 minute survey about your work experiences.

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact