TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Anteroser

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 63
  • HITs

Anteroser Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Slowly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Anteroser Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,099
Points: 6,463
Ratings: 2,065
Developer with experience using public APIs needed to give feedback on a website - $1.40

Underpaid

Excellent

Pending

$10.86 / hour

00:07:44 / completion time

Pros

These are well known, have a company behind them (https://userinput.io) and IME the requester is an incredibly nice person & responsive to inquiries/emails.

I can't stress the nice part enough. He's a good guy. I just wholly disagree with the way he runs this business on MTurk in a lot of cases, this HIT is a prime example of why.

Cons

$11/hr for the type of expertise they ask for in these HITs simply isn't worth it. For the worker, client, or userinput as a company IMO.

The entire HIT is writing detailed feedback based on what is supposed to be the user's expertise and on no other platform on Earth would I offer my services for $10/hr like this. I can go do a dead simple "pick A or B" image task on MTurk that I hardly even need to turn my brain on to complete for $18/hr.

The value trade here simply doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of fair. That generally ends one of two ways on MTurk: either people lie about their qualifications (so the client gets completely scammed) or they put in far less effort than they would if these actually paid a more professional rate.

I will say that unlike other companies that's not even this guy being cheap, you can go to their website & see their pricing and frankly they don't really make a ton being the middle man. I'd love to see them charge clients more & share some of that back with the workers. I know I'd do these more often and put in more effort for that kind of setup, as is I'd assume this continues to be bottom of the barrel quality.
Jan 23, 2019 | 13 workers found this helpful.

TheWerkz Average Pace
Reviews: 210
Points: 1,130
Ratings: 111
guys 40+ who like the outdoors. needed to give feedback on a website - $1.40

Fair

Unrated

Pending

$7.72 / hour

00:10:53 / completion time

Pros

Tell them exactly what you like or dislike about their website.
You don't even have to like it, just express your opinion and I plenty of 'em!
It was something to do when I was bored...

Cons

It's all writing, I knew that going-in, the minimum required isn't a lot for the 7 questions unless you really love typing.
Dec 3, 2018

Randomacts Proficient Worker
Reviews: 2,993
Points: 4,057
Ratings: 1,205
Feedback needed on a website - $1.40

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$21.18 / hour

00:03:58 / completion time

Pros

Just some quick writing. Type until the text disappears and keep typing until it feels comfortable.

ezpz

Always a great requester when you qual for the hits.

Cons

Writing

If you aren't okay with writing don't do these.
May 23, 2018 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Anteroser's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Anteroser


A3R7PKMIX4JIWV MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


2020 needed to give feedback on a website
Adults 18 to 65 needed to give feedback on a website needed to give feedback on a website
Adults interested in food, nutrition, and/or health needed to give feedback on an idea
Age 30-54 with children who pay someone else to do their taxes for them needed to give feedback on a website
ages 24-35 and 35-75 household income ranges of $50,000-$125K needed to give feedback on an idea

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact