TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Academic Researcher

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 13
  • HITs 5

Academic Researcher Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Academic Researcher Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Yoyo Average Pace
Reviews: 68
Points: 1,899
Ratings: 187
Happiness Valuation Survey (~10-15 min) - $1.50

Underpaid

Poor

Rejected (All)

$6.21 / hour

00:14:29 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

The work is extremely long. You'll have to go through about 26 pages of bubble hell, and there are sections where you have to write about conflicts. Each page has a minimum of 2-10 questions to answer, meaning you'll be answering about 130 questions by the end, not counting the writing segments. I sped through as fast as I could, but even as a fast reader, it took me almost 15 minutes to complete. Any slower than that, and you'll be looking at sub-$6 an hour... If you're not rejected.

The HIT was rejected for me being in the wrong demographic (I'm about 3 years outside of the age range they wanted), but there is no screener, nor is there anything in the title or the description of the HIT to indicate that there is any preferred demographics, and that all others will be rejected. There is only a single reference to an age range (I went back and checked) in the standard disclosure agreement page, which is easily missed.

EDIT: After a week, the Requestor finally got back to me. I explained to them how the rejection was in part due to their own fault, and they should include screeners, or at least put the demographic info they require in the title or on the Mturk page.

Instead, they ignored everything I said, and simply repeated the rejection note they left, saying I was in the wrong demographic to complete the survey. Clearly, this is a Requestor who has trouble reading, or if not, they're purposefully ignoring helpful criticism.

Because of that, I'd be very nervous to do any work for them in the future, even if they do heed my advice (which seems very unlikely, since they ignored everything I said to them).

Advice to Requester

Use screeners. And put the demographic info you require in the the description, if not the title of the HIT.

Have more respect for Workers. Allowing them to waste their time and then not paying them on top of that (for what a mistake that could easily have been avoided on your part!) is not a good way to get quality work.

EDIT: When you respond to Workers, actually READ what they've written to you. Don't simply reply with a generic "Sorry, you were part of the wrong demographic, we cannot help you" message.
Mar 1, 2022

Azazael Fast Reader
Reviews: 7,193
Points: 3,995
Ratings: 528
Emotions and Beliefs (~20 minutes) - $1.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$9.61 / hour

00:09:22 / completion time

Pros

Cons

LONG, whomever did this in under 4 minutes literally had to be throwing nonsense answers since there is SO much to answer

also be SUPER careful, this got reposted and I swear it was different, i just got rejected for this, 12-18

Advice to Requester

make exclusion quals so you arent wasting our time taking surveys and you reject us
Dec 11, 2020 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Trucker Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 1,511
Points: 3,104
Ratings: 781
Emotions and Beliefs (~20 minutes) - $1.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$6.67 / hour

00:13:29 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Very long and drawn out. Non-standardized question blocks. Very repetitive. The sheer volume of the survey is a real energy drain.
Dec 18, 2020

Want to see Academic Researcher's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Academic Researcher


A3PYUTJX5APFZ5 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Emotions and Beliefs (~20 minutes)
Happiness Valuation Survey (~10-15 min)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact