TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Experiment

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 41
  • HITs 94

Experiment Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays very badly

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Experiment Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

jatis New Reviewer
Reviews: 6
Points: 27
Ratings: 13
Ransomware -- Interaction Experiment (30~45 minutes) + Bonuses - $1.50 +0.90 bonus

Underpaid

Unacceptable

Pending

$2.63 / hour

00:54:47 / completion time

Pros

Nothing about this HIT was good.

Cons

1.) Requester stated that it takes 30-45 minutes, but the required 30 second interval spent chatting between rounds made this a 45 minute MINIMUM.
2.) You stated when not investing there is only an 80% chance to succeed an attack, yet EVERY SINGLE ATTACK SUCCEEDED. (not enough to be absolutely certain, but we had about 60 total data points to work with.)
3.) You stated the attacker was a human player, yet this person made algorithmic decisions designed to reduce the defenders earnings, not maximizing their own earnings. ( Don't know for certain but either the attacker was an idiot or a bot)
4.) You stated the total amount that can be earned is $6, $4.5 in bonuses and $1.5 in base pay. However even if I was able to retain the maximum number of points per round I would have only received $1.5 in bonus's. leaving me with a maximum of $3 total, half of what was promised.

Dishonest Requester, the only reason I didn't quit is because, based on reviews it would have made it impossible for the other participant to finish.

Advice to Requester

Don't lie to your workers, update your descriptions to be accurate, and pay us fairly.
I don't mind shit pay, because sometimes shit pay is better than no pay. As long as I am aware of this before I commit my time towards your HIT.
Jul 20, 2018 | 13 workers found this helpful.

Penelope Fast Reader
Reviews: 10,545
Points: 10,999
Ratings: 2,846
Interaction Experiment (15-30 minutes) + Bonuses - $0.50 +0.32 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$4.49 / hour

00:10:58 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Very deceitful. States there is an expected bonus between 50 cents and $6 in the consent form and indicates there is more than one round but only lets you play one. You will not earn anywhere near $6. A max of $1 can be earned per round which is also in their consent form.

" If you follow the instructions carefully and make good decisions, you may earn a considerable amount of money that will be paid to you in cash at the end of the experiment."

$1 is not a considerable amount of money by any stretch of the imagination.
Feb 20, 2020 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Krish C Careful Reader
Reviews: 26
Points: 83
Ratings: 4
Supply Chain - Interaction Experiment (15~45 minutes) + Bonuses - $0.25

Low

Unrated

Approved

$0.60 / hour

00:25:02 / completion time

Pros

none of the hits were rejected for me . all approved.

Cons

instructions are too long and there is a test afterwards. takes around 25 minutes to complete. base pay is low. I was expecting a good bonus. but that didn't happen either. It completely depends on luck and decision of other player. my bonus was $0.02. so disappointing.

Advice to Requester

can you give plz a base payment of atlest $.70 ?
May 28, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Experiment's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Experiment


A3PL20AJQQ0HI MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Dual Channel -- Interaction Experiment (15 minutes) + Bonuses
Experiment (45~60 minutes) + Bonuses
Face Interaction Experiment (15-30 minutes) + Bonuses
Healthcare Survey
Interaction Experiment (10-20 minutes) + Bonuses

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact