TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Ulrich Strunz

Verified
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 131
  • HITs 4

Ulrich Strunz Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Ulrich Strunz Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Pronewbi3 Proficient Worker
Reviews: 10,700
Points: 7,439
Ratings: 866
Complete an interactive behavior experiment with 12 rounds - $6.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

-The hit had an error on round 7 that would not let anyone proceed. The requester told everyone to submit with ID and the hit would be paid (which it has). I am not entering a completion time for this hit because I feel it unfairly skews data/pay sentiment based on an obvious technical error. The requester approved hits while not getting the data they wanted so if nothing else this shows a large amount of good faith towards being fair. I am writing this review because I feel this should be noted since many others would simply mass reject given the amount this hit paid.

Cons

-Spent 47 minutes trying to do the hit.

Advice to Requester

Given how widespread this was I'm sure if you reach out to workers a fair amount (myself included) would be willing to complete the hit at a later time.
Dec 4, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.
ustrunz (Requester):

Thank you very much for these kind words. The problem was fixed, and the experiment is now doing fine.


Razr Average Pace
Reviews: 1,095
Points: 955
Ratings: 90
Complete an interactive behavior experiment with 12 rounds - $6.00

Unrated

Excellent

Approved

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

-The task was fun before it broke.

-Approved quickly

-There was a chance to earn a bonus.

-I think the pay would've been generous if I could've completed the task. I didn't rate the pay and removed my time because it wasn't accurate.

The requester is active on reddit and responded pretty quickly to the issues everyone was having.

Cons

Hit broke halfway through

I had issues getting into the hit in chrome and had to switch to Firefox. Firefox didn't work at first, but worked after clearing my cache. The requester included troubleshooting tips so that's a plus.
Dec 4, 2019
ustrunz (Requester):

Thank you for your objectivity, the problem is now fixed.


Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Complete survey and behavior experiment. - $2.05

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$17.45 / hour

00:07:03 / completion time

Pros

pretty quick once you get into the server

Cons

-The button didnt work as indicated in the directions. Sure enough, if you press the button and wait, it will eventually get to the next screen which are similarly delayed. Try refreshing the page if it still doesnt progress quick enough.
-Start right away! Its got a short timer and if the server lags, youll spend half your time like I did just trying to get in.
Jun 28, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.
ustrunz (Requester):

Thank you for this feedback. Looking into server issues.


Want to see Ulrich Strunz's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Ulrich Strunz


A3LU6XQIFDYX1J MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey with 1 question
Answer a survey with 2 questions
Answer a survey with 3 questions
Answer a survey with just 1 question
Complete an interactive behavior experiment with 12 rounds

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact