TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Elisa Hofmann

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 65
  • HITs

Elisa Hofmann Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Elisa Hofmann Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Kan Du Average Pace
Reviews: 1,138
Points: 2,600
Ratings: 382
Survey about decision-making - $1.00

Unrated

Excellent

Approved

$9.38 / hour

00:06:24 / completion time

Pros

Update: Initially rejected, but I communicated with the requester and she told me the reason was because I'd used initials instead of first names for the people I'd used in the study and she couldn't confirm they were of the right sex. I explained that I had done so because of privacy reasons, and had done so before, and that it had never occurred to me that it could lead to a rejection. I gave her the real names. She told me she's reversing the rejection.

The requester was very nice.

Update: The rejection has been reversed.

Cons

reCAPTCHA at the beginning, which, as usual for me, takes forever to load and submit. For the space for my age, it told me I had to enter a valid email address, so I added "@gmail.com" after my age. It had a spot where I had to enter a name of a person fitting a certain characteristic, and there was NO ONE for me. So I entered "NA" for the person's name, 0 for their age and how long I've known them, and for where I had to say how I knew the person, I selected "other" and wrote "There is no such person".
Oct 28, 2018 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Random Jobber Fast Reader
Reviews: 11,834
Points: 14,986
Ratings: 1,867
Answer a survey about decision-making - $0.50 +0.50 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Unrated

Approved

$12.63 / hour

00:04:45 / completion time

Pros

-$0.5 bonus received 11/23 for a randomly selecting response matching the same choice as a majority of other respondents., changed pay rating to good, though it's pretty underpaid without the bonus.

Cons

Excessive comprehension questions about how to earn the bonuses and then you have to write about how you can earn the bonuses for both scenarios even though you just answered all the comprehension questions about it, why?
Nov 20, 2018 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Rin Average Pace
Reviews: 11,990
Points: 6,248
Ratings: 599
Answer a survey about decision-making - $0.50

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$3.85 / hour

00:07:48 / completion time

Pros

Cons

This survey was terrible. Every single question was a check to see if you are legitimately doing the survey. There is a wall of text on several pages and is severely underpaid for being treated like I'm an incompetent chimp.

Advice to Requester

I don't appreciate how your survey portrays the view of workers. We are people, we do pay attention, we aren't here just clicking buttons and your academic survey instructions shouldn't make me feel like I'm an idiot.
Nov 25, 2018 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Elisa Hofmann's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Elisa Hofmann


A3LH5ZXCOMDYML MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about decision-making
Survey about a pricing mechanism
Survey about decision-making

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact