TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Han-Min Kim

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 55
  • HITs 14

Han-Min Kim Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Han-Min Kim Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Charlie Rose Proficient Worker
Reviews: 7,726
Points: 5,289
Ratings: 545
Research Survey (Give us your opinion about COVID-19 prevention information of Social Media) (35~40 Min) - $2.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Rejected (Fair)

$15.79 / hour

00:07:36 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Survey was Rejected with the following explanation:
"In the survey description (we described: If you have previously responded to this questionnaire, please do not take it again.), we asked those who previously responded to our research survey not to respond again. However, you have responded to our survey twice or more. We are sorry to have inevitably refused the survey."

The duplicate survey in question was titled: Research Survey (COVID-19 prevention information of CDC) [Version 3: CDC] - $2.00.

The survey I got the rejection on was called Research Survey (Give us your opinion about COVID-19 prevention information of Social Media) (35~40 Min) - $2.00.

Granted, this was my fault for not realizing it was the same requestor/hit, but the content was different and since I did not get kicked out, I had no way of knowing it was a duplicate response.

Advice to Requester

If you do not want duplicate(s), then do not title the HIT something different and/or add qualifications/disqualifications instead of rejecting work.
Feb 13, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Dan Brown Careful Reader
Reviews: 161
Points: 72
Ratings: 13
Research Survey (give us your opinion about COVID-19 prevention information of CDC) (~35 Min) - $2.00

Unrated

Unrated

Rejected (All)

$4.70 / hour

00:25:33 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

In this study, reverse questionnaire items were mixed to secure the quality of the questionnaire responses. In addition, we have check survey items to make sure that you have sincerely read the description required for the survey. We can check whether the respondent has sincerely answered the questionnaire through the reverse questionnaire items and check items. However, this worker did not properly read the questionnaire and responded the same to all reverse questionnaire. As a result, this worker answered the wrong questionnaire.
Feb 17, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

johnxyz Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,535
Points: 13,357
Ratings: 1,280
Research Survey (COVID-19 prevention information of Social Media) [Version 7] - $2.00

Generous

Unrated

Rejected (Fair)

$22.50 / hour

00:05:20 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Requester has 56% approval rate
REJECTED: Already taken this survey

Advice to Requester

Please consider screening out workers who have already completed the survey so they are unable to complete it multiple times.
Feb 5, 2021 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Han-Min Kim's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Han-Min Kim


A3L0ZI2VVLX4E4 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about your opinions (COVID-19 prevention information) [Version 1]
Research Survey (COVID-19 prevention information of CDC) [Version 1]
Research Survey (COVID-19 prevention information of CDC) [Version 1] Extend
Research Survey (COVID-19 prevention information of CDC) [Version 3: CDC]
Research Survey (COVID-19 prevention information of Social Media) [Version 5]

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact