TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Louis-Pierre Lepage

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 97
  • HITs 4

Louis-Pierre Lepage Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Louis-Pierre Lepage Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Buntastic Average Pace
Reviews: 1,173
Points: 1,454
Ratings: 413
Study: Decision Making Under Uncertainty - $1.00

Unrated

Poor

Rejected (Unfair)

$8.09 / hour

00:07:25 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Rejected with no feedback. Upon contacting, was told I completed "too fast" rendering my results unusable. After pointing out other TV reviews with similar times, he responded that they were "approved too soon" and their data was useless also. Also claimed that because I didn't explore all the options (trying to be vague and not use survey content here) my data was useless, despite that not being a requirement in the survey.

Made it clear that he will be rejecting in the future for times less than the 20 minutes he has estimated so prepare your ovens for that bake.
Update: The requester also decided to discuss my rejection and work with another worker so that will be a fun IRB email.
Jan 10, 2019 | 27 workers found this helpful.

bugeekman Proficient Worker
Reviews: 28,245
Points: 17,556
Ratings: 1,047
Study: Decision Making Under Uncertainty - $1.00 +1.83 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$13.35 / hour

00:12:43 / completion time

Pros

Cons

One particular question in the comprehension quiz was poorly worded and ended up getting me stuck for about 6-8 minutes. The question was what's the minimum random number and still get a bonus. The answer is in the question itself, the last number they give you. For me, it was the maximum value, not the minimum. Making sure his comprehension checks are correct is not a priority apparently.

The experiment itself is not that complicated, but as per usual, these requesters are professionals when it comes to making simple things complex.

Most of the pay is bonus. Bonus was told to be 2.83, but was paid 1.83.

Advice to Requester

Check your work
Sep 3, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,489
Points: 12,392
Ratings: 1,218
Study: Decision Making Under Uncertainty - $1.00 +2.22 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$14.69 / hour

00:13:09 / completion time

Pros

Bonus, but this is a weak pro.

Edit: base and bonus payments paid within minutes of completing.

Cons

Unnecessarily complicated instructions. At least 2/3 of my overall completion time was spent reading, digesting, and answering the comprehension checks.

Bonus is highly dependent on randomness and luck. Looking at TV, it looks like the average is around $2.
Aug 14, 2021 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Louis-Pierre Lepage's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Louis-Pierre Lepage


A3JYXI7TSIWOFH MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Study: Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Study: Decision Making Under Uncertainty I
Study: Decision Making Under Uncertainty II
Study: Decision Making Under Uncertainty III

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact