TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Egnerlab

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 150
  • HITs 102

Egnerlab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Egnerlab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Hu8b4Du6A Proficient Worker
Reviews: 46
Points: 175
Ratings: 34
Compensation HIT for A1DZMZTXWOM9MR - $15.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$60.07 / hour

00:14:59 / completion time

Pros

I ran into a issue at the end of the study, as I was unable to submit at the demographics page. I let the requester know about the issue and they promptly responded with an apology and then set up a compensation HIT for me.

The original study took me about a hour or so to complete. It definitely requires full attention in order to complete the memory portion sufficiently.

Also, the task appears to have a bug in it that calculates the score were need to get 70% of the categorization trials correct . It reported that I had only gotten 58% correct, when it should have been more like 97%. I let the requester know about this, and they said that there was a error in the code for the task. Hope this is helpful to someone who might find their score to be lower than it should be.

Cons

Mar 31, 2022 | 4 workers found this helpful.

lapetitebaker Proficient Worker
Reviews: 26,725
Points: 20,764
Ratings: 2,206
Word and Color Matching Task - $7.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$11.03 / hour

00:38:04 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Throw this back! Don't waste your time on it, even on a slow post-holiday week.

• You need to have 6 fingers on the keyboard and ready to react within 2 seconds for nearly 40 minutes straight without breaks
• You have to meet a task-randomness threshold (without "showing signs of counting") and an accuracy threshold and you aren't told if you meet either before submitting
• No desperately-needed progress indicator

Advice to Requester

This desperately needs a progress indicator and time for breaks. You cannot expect people to be mentally and physically focused for nearly 40 minutes straight without any breaks or signs of progress.
Jul 7, 2021 | 16 workers found this helpful.

aHazyGhost Fast Reader
Reviews: 9,900
Points: 6,630
Ratings: 304
Card Sorting Experiment - $2.50 +1.95 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$14.79 / hour

00:18:03 / completion time

Pros

Seems the requester improved the HIT. The practice section is short and only 40 trials. The main task is broken up into 2 blocks, and your accuracy is reported at the end of each block. I got over 80% so there's no reason I should be rejected (below 65% is a rejection). A lot of bonus is given.

HIT approved within hours. Seems safe to complete despite all the return reviews. Just make sure you pay attention and score around 80% accuracy to prevent a rejection.

Cons

Even if you get an answer right, it can be reported as wrong. This means you lose bonus money AND your accuracy goes down.

Bonus given was lower than what was stated at the end of the task ($1.95 instead of the $2.20 stated).
May 22, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Egnerlab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Egnerlab


A3IMZXW77D8UIO MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Bandit (Slot Machine) Task
Card Sorting Experiment
Compensation HIT for A1DZMZTXWOM9MR
Compensation hit for A2Y0WNHMT4PZ4C
Doors Task

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact