TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Germinator Task

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 32
  • HITs 9

Germinator Task Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Germinator Task Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
A Study on Attention and Mental Health v11 - $15.60 +3.00 bonus

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$13.90 / hour

01:20:16 / completion time

Pros

Its over!

Cons

Oh man. Where do I begin?
1) The time you see here is very similar to what you will do this in assuming no breaks in between trials.
2) Part 1 is 4 blocks, each taking 4 minutes(yes, this is an accurate estimate stated by the requester).
3) Part 2 is 8 blocks, each also taking 4 minutes
4) Part 1 is relatively paintless
5) Part 2 is awful. Just mind numbingly awful. I would rather do a thousand James Billings, than have to do Part 2 again. It requires constant attention. You look away for a second, you'll miss a trial and you'll get one step closer to not getting the $3.00 bonus for completing all trials with a >80% average
6) Part 1 and 2 each have an actual 4 minute block that you need to complete successfully with >80% accuracy in order to advance.

Lets do some maths.
Part 1: 4min x 5 blocks(trial+4)=20min
Part 2: 4min x 9 blocks(trial+8)=36min
=56 minutes of mind numbing finger alternating tasks. This does not consider the breaks you can take, or take into consideration additional blocks if your brain screwed up the K and the D buttons on part 2 like mine did. My keyboard almost went across the room trying to get past the training block of Part 2 since I wrote down the instructions incorrectly on my scratch pad.

Overall, this is pure, unadulterated punishment. I've done similar mind numbing HITs, but at least they paid out and you felt like you were really doing it for something. I got to the end of this one and I felt empty.

Oh. AC's. Watch out for those on Part 3 where there are 196 pages. Some pages have more than one question on them, some don't.
May 18, 2020 | 19 workers found this helpful.

bmt Proficient Worker
Reviews: 14,466
Points: 12,517
Ratings: 1,347
A Study on Attention and Mental Health v9 - $15.60 +3.00 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Unrated

Approved

$14.99 / hour

01:14:27 / completion time

Pros

- Fair compensation for a very long study, for once.
- $3 bonus for 80%+ accuracy; paid out 5/30
- Part I has to do with pressing keys if you see certain things on the screen and you need, I think it was 70% minimum accuracy? I'm not sure what happens if you go below that. There are 8 blocks and two tasks, so 16 parts for the first task; you get breaks between blocks but you cannot pause during a task. RIP if your face gets itchy or someone rings your doorbell.
- Part II is a questionnaire split up into those brain teaser questions (spatial visualization, mostly, not math) and then a boatload of mental health/substance abuse questions, including the standard ones. There were 199 pages; every question had its own page and a slight timer before the Next button appeared, so this part could definitely have been designed to be more efficient for the survey taker.

Cons

- I felt every minute of this.
- No feedback form at the end.
- A couple questions seemed to assume everyone taking the study was heterosexual (asking about the opposite sex) which seemed odd in 2020.
May 29, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Random Jobber Fast Reader
Reviews: 11,834
Points: 14,986
Ratings: 1,867
A Study on Attention and Mental Health v11 - $15.60 +3.00 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$15.03 / hour

01:14:14 / completion time

Pros

Bonus seems reasonably easy to achieve with focus

Cons

57 minutes of very boring timed button pressing tasks, says the survey afterwards is self-paced which isn't exactly true as two substantial sections of it have timers even though the questionnaires are presented 1 question per page. Multiple questions in the survey could potentially have short written responses depending on how you answer. Overall pay is kind of meh IMO for the amount of time and boredom involved.
May 12, 2020 | 13 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Germinator Task's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Germinator Task


A3IEGQRXJ5HE7F MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


A Study on Attention and Mental Health v10
A Study on Attention and Mental Health v11
A Study on Attention and Mental Health v12
A Study on Attention and Mental Health v9

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact