TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Frankline Muthomi

Is this your requester account?
Northern Illinois University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 72
  • HITs 5

Frankline Muthomi Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

Blocks Reported
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Frankline Muthomi Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,427
This is for Worker ID ONLY. All others will be rejected - $0.50

Unrated

Poor

Approved

$4.04 / hour

00:07:26 / completion time
  • Account Blocked

Pros

This is in relation to a hit that was completed last week - Had to work on the original simulation putting our MTurk ID number into that
12.15.2021- the rejection was unexpectedly reversed - the main hit to this one is still showing rejected

Cons

WARNING!
Normally requesters would send an email - I happened to see this posted in a 'daily hit forum' otherwise I think I would have missed this one.
11.23.2021-It appears the requester has rejected my submission, I am not the only one. "Incomplete budget simulation or unmatched unique and survey codes in qualtrics and balancing act exercise." I have sent a message and will update.
11.24.2021- received a reply (if you could call it that) who told me that I did not put the codes in the correct places as instructed. If that was the case why set up this second hit based on the first one instructing everyone to put the codes in again? I replied and know this won't be reversed, I highly recommend avoiding this requester-Totally unfair and unethical if you ask me!
I believe they had the intention of getting free work, that's how it feels to me, I feel totally duped!
12.15.2021- well it appears that they reversed this rejection which I suppose is a nice surprise, the other is still showing rejected!

Advice to Requester

There are more professional ways to respond. If you are going to reject someone for not completing the first hit properly in the first place WHY set up this hit asking people to add a code because the first one was not set up correctly by you?
Nov 18, 2021 | 9 workers found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,427
Answer a survey about your opinions in reallocating fiscal resources. - $2.00

Unrated

Poor

Rejected (Unfair)

$5.80 / hour

00:20:42 / completion time
  • Account Blocked
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

About local governments and budgets - a link is given and you work on a task follow the instructions - I didn't mind that made it a little different to the usual type surveys - could be done faster

Cons

Underpaid

WARNING! I would NOT recommend doing any work for this person.
11.23.2021-It appears the requester has rejected my submission, I am not the only one. "Incomplete budget simulation or unmatched unique and survey codes in qualtrics and balancing act exercise." I have sent a message and will update.
11.24.2021- received a reply (if you could call it that) who told me that I did not put the codes in the correct places as instructed. If that was the case why set up a second hit based on this one instructing everyone to put the codes in again? I replied and know this won't be reversed, I highly recommend avoiding this requester-Totally unfair and unethical if you ask me!
I believe they had the intention of getting free work, that's how it feels to me, I feel totally duped!

Advice to Requester

There are more professional ways to respond. If you are going to reject someone for not completing a hit properly in the first place WHY set up a second hit asking people to add a code because the first one was not set up correctly by you?
Nov 15, 2021 | 6 workers found this helpful.

johnxyz Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,509
Points: 13,324
Ratings: 1,263
Answer a survey about your opinions in reallocating fiscal resources. - $2.00

Underpaid

Poor

Approved

$6.23 / hour

00:19:15 / completion time

Pros

Cons

REJECTED: "Incomplete budget simulation or unmatched unique and survey codes in qualtrics and balancing act exercise." I definitely completed that portion... sent a message about this and will update if I hear back.
UPDATE (Dec 9): There was an opportunity to do the survey again to get the rejection reversed. Time has been added to the completion time for the re-take, will update if reversed.
UPDATE (Dec 10): Rejection was finally reversed.
------
Must visit an external site
Lots of questions with only 1 per page
Brief writing

Advice to Requester

We should not have to deal with multiple completion codes and data getting lost. Please try to be more professional in your responses.
Nov 15, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Frankline Muthomi's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Frankline Muthomi


A3I17BPUXPPNY1 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about budgetary decisions
Answer a survey about your opinions in reallocating fiscal resources.
This is for Worker ID ONLY. All others will be rejected

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact