Frankline Muthomi Ratings
Workers feel this requester pays well
Approves Quickly
Blocks Reported
Frankline Muthomi Wage History
Top Worker Reviews
Hedgmog Careful Reader
This is for Worker ID ONLY. All others will be rejected - $0.50
Unrated
Poor
Approved
$4.04 / hour
00:07:26 / completion time
- Account Blocked
Pros
This is in relation to a hit that was completed last week - Had to work on the original simulation putting our MTurk ID number into that12.15.2021- the rejection was unexpectedly reversed - the main hit to this one is still showing rejected
Cons
WARNING!Normally requesters would send an email - I happened to see this posted in a 'daily hit forum' otherwise I think I would have missed this one.
11.23.2021-It appears the requester has rejected my submission, I am not the only one. "Incomplete budget simulation or unmatched unique and survey codes in qualtrics and balancing act exercise." I have sent a message and will update.
11.24.2021- received a reply (if you could call it that) who told me that I did not put the codes in the correct places as instructed. If that was the case why set up this second hit based on the first one instructing everyone to put the codes in again? I replied and know this won't be reversed, I highly recommend avoiding this requester-Totally unfair and unethical if you ask me!
I believe they had the intention of getting free work, that's how it feels to me, I feel totally duped!
12.15.2021- well it appears that they reversed this rejection which I suppose is a nice surprise, the other is still showing rejected!
Advice to Requester
There are more professional ways to respond. If you are going to reject someone for not completing the first hit properly in the first place WHY set up this hit asking people to add a code because the first one was not set up correctly by you?Hedgmog Careful Reader
Answer a survey about your opinions in reallocating fiscal resources. - $2.00
Unrated
Poor
Rejected (Unfair)
$5.80 / hour
00:20:42 / completion time
- Account Blocked
- HIT Rejected
Pros
About local governments and budgets - a link is given and you work on a task follow the instructions - I didn't mind that made it a little different to the usual type surveys - could be done fasterCons
UnderpaidWARNING! I would NOT recommend doing any work for this person.
11.23.2021-It appears the requester has rejected my submission, I am not the only one. "Incomplete budget simulation or unmatched unique and survey codes in qualtrics and balancing act exercise." I have sent a message and will update.
11.24.2021- received a reply (if you could call it that) who told me that I did not put the codes in the correct places as instructed. If that was the case why set up a second hit based on this one instructing everyone to put the codes in again? I replied and know this won't be reversed, I highly recommend avoiding this requester-Totally unfair and unethical if you ask me!
I believe they had the intention of getting free work, that's how it feels to me, I feel totally duped!
Advice to Requester
There are more professional ways to respond. If you are going to reject someone for not completing a hit properly in the first place WHY set up a second hit asking people to add a code because the first one was not set up correctly by you?johnxyz Proficient Worker
Answer a survey about your opinions in reallocating fiscal resources. - $2.00
Underpaid
Poor
Approved
$6.23 / hour
00:19:15 / completion time
Pros
Cons
REJECTED: "Incomplete budget simulation or unmatched unique and survey codes in qualtrics and balancing act exercise." I definitely completed that portion... sent a message about this and will update if I hear back.UPDATE (Dec 9): There was an opportunity to do the survey again to get the rejection reversed. Time has been added to the completion time for the re-take, will update if reversed.
UPDATE (Dec 10): Rejection was finally reversed.
------
Must visit an external site
Lots of questions with only 1 per page
Brief writing
Advice to Requester
We should not have to deal with multiple completion codes and data getting lost. Please try to be more professional in your responses.