TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Amazon Requester Inc. - A9 Data Validation

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 624
  • HITs 66

Amazon Requester Inc. - A9 Data Validation Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Amazon Requester Inc. - A9 Data Validation Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,099
Points: 6,463
Ratings: 2,065
Yes or No (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) - $0.01

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$36.00 / hour

00:00:01 / completion time

Pros

Hourly is based on 3,000 HITs so its pretty well evened out - however it honestly isn't reflective of what you'd make in an hour sitting down to work on them. A simple sneeze or bathroom break will plummet this hourly very quickly. However with a script & good workflow setup 99.99% of these can be submitted in less than a second.

A9 has been known to reject failed quality control questions but they are still one of the easiest ways to increase overall # count & account padding for other rejections so they can be worth sitting down to work while watching Netflix or something. As long as you read instructions & keep a moderate amount of focus you will come out way, WAY ahead for building buffer from their batches.

These approved in only one day. Usually approve in 3 days, unsure on this batch though but in the past they have simply used mTurk default autoapproval w/ spot checks for quality.

Cons

Without a script frankly these would be terrible. Most of the time for A9s people are nice enough to share one on the forums though.

Throttling can lower the effective hourly even with a good workflow when its bad enough or your internet/load times don't cooperate.
Aug 10, 2018 | 20 workers found this helpful.

morweeg Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,518
Points: 3,128
Ratings: 897
ShoeComp (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content.) - $0.01

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$4.00 / hour

00:00:09 / completion time

Pros

Cons

US qual on work that's blatantly underpaid. This requester seriously expects American workers to work for only $4/hr (which is well below every single minimum wage standard in the United States.) 4 questions for a single shiny penny? Are you for real? This is why people write articles about Mechanical Turk workers being underpaid and exploited, coming from an actual Amazon requester this kind of behavior should be unacceptable.
Jul 18, 2019 | 13 workers found this helpful.

morweeg Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,518
Points: 3,128
Ratings: 897
Draw Bounding Boxes Around Person (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content.) - $0.01

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$2.25 / hour

00:00:16 / completion time

Pros

lol

Cons

Amazon requester.
Location EqualTo US
Bounding boxes for a single shiny penny.
There's basically absolutely zero reason this should have the US qual and the fact that these will get done by actual American workers is almost as sad as the fact that this is a well-known Amazon requester underpaying for work that should pay at least 10x as much. It's pretty obvious that this requester is exploiting the willingness people have to work for any amount of pay as long as it pays their bills, and the fact that it's an Amazon requester to boot is just disheartening.
Dec 17, 2019 | 4 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Amazon Requester Inc. - A9 Data Validation's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Amazon Requester Inc. - A9 Data Validation


A3HLF55H6JSTI0 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer Clothing Questions - xaa (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Answer Clothing Questions - xab (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Answer Clothing Questions - xac (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.
Answer Occasion inspiration Questions (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)
Answer Product Questions (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact