TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Mary Pat Connolly

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 7
  • HITs

Mary Pat Connolly Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Okay Communication

Approves Slowly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Mary Pat Connolly Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Biotech People Sourcing - $2.00

Unrated

Acceptable

Rejected (Unfair)

$12.65 / hour

00:09:29 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

copy paste

Cons

So i had contacted the requester about this HIT since the thing was broken when i did it, however never heard back. Well, I heard back and it was rejected for doing exactly what she was looking for. the reason? "x" So i dont know what they wanted nor what i did wrong. Either way, watch out on this one and I would just avoid it. Clearly the requester doesnt read thier emails to see that the hit was broken and I had did my best to make it work. Clearly that wasnt good enough. lol.


So i heard back from the requester and it was an error that I had done a profile on a company that they did not intend for me to do. I do not recall seeing any other links or URL's to complete the HIT, so I did it on the URL listed. Apparently I was wrong and so were others who were also rejected. I asked to redo the HIT for a 0.00 pay and the requester stated they would look into it. I heard back this morning and apparently they are unable to post another HIT for some reason. Either way, i would be very cautious doing these since the requester is not familiar with Mturk and may not provide clear enough instructions to do thier HIT which will result in a rejection. Not a huge deal, but I find it dumb that they dont know how to post an alternative non-paying HIT in return for rejection reversal. So if you get rejected on this one, dont expect anything in return.

the directions are somewhat confusing. For one, there was 15 directors not including the 1 they showed as an example. So they indicate list all 16, so I included the one they gave as an example as the 16th. Also, the Category section is glitched, so you couldnt put the category for each person in. Messaged requester.

Advice to Requester

Your hit was broken and didnt have multiple boxes to fill in spots like the example. If this was the reason for the reject, I advise you read your emails more since I tried to explain what was wrong and why I could not complete the HIT exactly the way the example shows. Also, if you are going to reject somebody, give a reason. A simple X is ridiculous.
Feb 15, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.

scoot412 Fast Reader
Reviews: 1,210
Points: 5,460
Ratings: 737
Biotech People Sourcing - $5.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$18.93 / hour

00:15:51 / completion time

Pros

Assuming that this pays, it was a good HIT. I could have gone faster but spent a lot of time rereading the instructions because of all of the threats of rejections.
It was super easy....go to the given website and c/p three pieces of data for company board members.
Directions were clear and a good example of what she was looking for was provided
Very long timer...I think it was 5 days
Edit: HIT was approved 3 days after submission

Cons

Many threats of rejection in the instructions
Dec 17, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

CorvusSapiens Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 2,048
Points: 1,501
Ratings: 208
Biotech People Sourcing - $5.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$35.02 / hour

00:08:34 / completion time

Pros

copy and paste information from a website
could have been faster if I wasn't double checking the instructions

Cons

some information might not be available and though (i think) you can submit without it, there's a threat of rejection in the instructions if you miss information that was available
Dec 13, 2018 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Mary Pat Connolly's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Mary Pat Connolly


A3H1NWLVA40F4J MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Biotech People Sourcing

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact