TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Alexa

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 70
  • HITs 97

Alexa Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Alexa Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

madcat2k Fast Reader
Reviews: 362
Points: 513
Ratings: 62
Does this sentence encourage unsafe usage of the product? - $0.10

Low

Unacceptable

Rejected (All)

$18.00 / hour

00:00:20 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

None.

Cons

MASS rejected every single hit. Absolutely insane. Not even ONE approved. First, I speed read and don't read in my head so this wasn't that hard for me to comprehend 99% of what was written. Second, failing every single hit on a SUBJECTIVE task where you have to intepret if someone is saying something harmful or not? Come on. This requester is borderline predatory at this point. HUNDREDS of hits rejected is almost more than my entire 10 years of working and over half a million approved hits. If my work was that bad I wouldn't have only a couple of hundred rejections over 500k approved then....*sigh* this hurts. This wasn't even a great paid hit, most were like 10-15 dollars per hour pay, so I worked hours on these average paid hits.

Be careful because if they don't like any of your work, everything is getting painted with the same brush.

Advice to Requester

Please don't mass reject people because you don't like their work and try to claim I missed annotation "check" in the hit. Or if you mass reject because I failed a few annotation checks, out of hundreds, don't mass reject every single one. That's really BAD to assume every single worker is bad because a few responses in HUNDREDS of hits were "bad".
Jun 14, 2022 | 11 workers found this helpful.

laby Average Pace
Reviews: 14,363
Points: 10,453
Ratings: 1,188
Is the product relevant to the question? - $0.10

Low

Unrated

Rejected (Some)

$10.00 / hour

00:00:36 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

A couple of rejections for getting test questions wrong.
I did feel like I could have used some actual examples because the instructions, especially rule 2, about extensions of the product was a little confusing to me.

one of the questions I got wrong seems very clear cut so I'm not sure how I got that one wrong.
Oct 11, 2021 | 6 workers found this helpful.

hstreett95 New Reviewer
Reviews: 10
Points: 64
Ratings: 5
Is this a good experience response? - $0.03

Good

Unrated

Approved

$18.00 / hour

00:00:06 / completion time

Pros

I have enjoyed and done well with Alexa hits before, so I gave these a shot despite the rejection risk. The hourly rate averages out great (I appreciate that the requester added shift+enter for submit unlike some of their other batches).

Cons

None yet! If rejections come in, I would say they need to create more specific examples and instructions for each point on the scale.

Advice to Requester

Add the numbers 1-5 as keyboard shortcuts for each answer option.
Jan 19, 2022

Want to see Alexa's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Alexa


A3F06OCWPAFC7T MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Assess the relevance of a product shopping related question
Does the text express a need?
Does this sentence encourage unsafe usage of the product?
Evaluate the quality of a product-shopping-related question
How is the meaning of these two answers related?

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact